Add button to re-download torrent data if missing#1499
Open
Add button to re-download torrent data if missing#1499
Conversation
Member
|
Should we not try to detect the state in which data does not correspond with the torrent. |
Contributor
Author
|
I think webtorrent checks this when starting a torrent? |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
Muhnad
reviewed
Jun 9, 2019
| Fix and restart the app, or delete the torrent. | ||
| Torrent data missing.<br /> | ||
| Fix or click to | ||
| <a onClick={(e) => { |
Comment on lines
+410
to
+411
| delete summary.path | ||
| delete summary.error |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allows to re-download torrent data if it has been deleted.
Otherwise you would have to remove the torrent and add it again.
Not sure if the message or style is quite right?
Edit: probably fixes #1355.