Skip to content

Conversation

@thescientist13
Copy link
Collaborator

resolves #43

  1. Added Introductory sections for Browser Parity and Spec Alignment
  2. Minor code formatting fixes

Screen Shot 2022-09-04 at 1 38 38 PM
Screen Shot 2022-09-04 at 1 39 23 PM

<p>It's worth noting that many of these pain points are directly related to Shadow DOM's encapsulation. While there are many benefits to some types of widely shared components to strong encapsulation, the friction of strong encapsulation has prevented most developers from adopting Shadow DOM, to the point of there being alternate proposals for style scoping that don't use Shadow DOM. We urge browser vendors to recognize these barriers and work to make Shadow DOM more usable by more developers.</p>
<section>
<h3>Browser Parity</h3>
<p>We noticed the following specs already have a high degree of alignment from an implementation perspective, but support in browsers is still not equally distributed. Filing in these gaps would be a big win for users and developers alike for a more predictable web.</p>
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, should be filling. Knew that one looked odd. 😅

@thescientist13 thescientist13 mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2022
@thescientist13 thescientist13 changed the title Report 2022 add browser parity and spec alignment sections add browser parity and spec alignment sections Sep 5, 2022
@thescientist13 thescientist13 merged commit d6d85f6 into main Sep 11, 2022
@thescientist13 thescientist13 deleted the report-2022-add-browser-parity-and-spec-alignment-sections branch September 11, 2022 16:18
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2022
…ec-alignment-sections

SHA: d6d85f6
Reason: push, by @thescientist13

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2022 Report Outline

3 participants