Add did:trail method entry#669
Conversation
Replace trail-protocol.org references with trailprotocol.org, which is the actual registered domain. Addresses review comment by @davidlehn.
|
Thanks for catching that, @davidlehn! The domain I've updated the Let me know if there's anything else needed for the submission. |
TRAIL Protocol Update — v1.1.1-draft (2026-03-04)Following the v1.1.0-draft update earlier today, we have addressed 10 additional issues identified during a comprehensive internal cryptographic and protocol review. All changes are committed to the trail-did-method repository. Changes SummaryCryptographic correctness:
ABNF grammar fix:
Documentation improvements:
Reference implementation:
All changes strengthen W3C DID Core 1.0 conformance. The specification, examples, and reference implementation remain consistent. |
🔄 Spec Update: v1.1.0-draft — Crypto Agility, Key Rotation, VersioningWe've pushed a significant update to the New in v1.1.0-draftSpec Changes (4 new sections):
Reference Implementation (
Changelog items #10-#13 added to spec (on top of the 9 fixes from the previous update). 📂 Full diff: trailprotocol/trail-did-method@c9efb20...76496e2 |
Security Fix + Spec Enhancements (2026-03-04)🔒 BREAKING: Hash suffix increased from 48-bit to 64-bitThe trail-hash = 16HEXDIG ; was: 12HEXDIGThis change affects all New: Technical differentiation matrix (§1.3)Added New: Protocol Roadmap (§8.11)Added formal roadmap section documenting planned features for v1.2.0 (npm publish, CI/CD, credential revocation, Universal Resolver driver) and v2.0.0 (Registry Server, Trust Score Engine, multiple reference implementations, post-quantum migration). Reference Implementation
📂 Full diff: trailprotocol/trail-did-method@76496e2...824653c |
|
Hi @OR13 @msporny @rhiaro — just a friendly ping on this PR. Since the initial submission, we've made solid progress on the did:trail ecosystem:
We'd be grateful for a review when you have a moment. Happy to address any feedback. |
gatemezing
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You need to change the status in the JSON file to "registered"
Address review feedback from @gatemezing — set status to "registered" per W3C DID method registration workflow. Update contactEmail to the TRAIL Protocol domain address.
Thanks @gatemezing - updated
Commit: cd4f0e7 Thank you for this useful hint! |
DID Method Registration
As a DID method registrant, I have ensured that my DID method registration complies with the following statements:
contactEmailaddress [OPTIONAL].verifiableDataRegistryentry [OPTIONAL].