-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
apr: update to 1.7.4 #42972
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
apr: update to 1.7.4 #42972
Conversation
3711619 to
f7ee083
Compare
|
I've managed to somewhat test this with apache in a x86_64-glibc chroot. I manually bumped apr-util to Maybe not the most thorough of tests, but I can successfully start Output from
|
|
@classabbyamp is there anything else I can do to help get this merged? |
| post_extract() { | ||
| if [ "${XBPS_TARGET_LIBC}" = "musl" ]; then | ||
| patch -d "${wrksrc}" -Np1 <"${FILESDIR}/musl-dso.patch" | ||
| fi | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this patch also work on glibc? If yes, we should put it to patches/ and not apply it manually here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this patch isn't really correct, the reason the test fails is because dlclose is a no-op and doesn't actually unload anything: https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Unloading-libraries
the correct thing to do is skip the test on musl
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nekopsykose That's very useful info about musl's dlclose. I couldn't wrap my head around why it didn't appear to unload the lib. I've now patched out the tests instead. Thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paper42 The (now updated) patch is only applicable to musl, but I guess it would work on glibc too. Would it be preferable to apply the patch unconditionally?
f7ee083 to
78632db
Compare
|
Updated the version to |
|
Pull Requests become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this pull request is still relevant bump it or assign it. |
Testing the changes
Local build testing
This also addresses #42441
Tests to fix
testatomic: consistency failure on atomic (i686)testsockets: Socket bind failure (x86_64, i686, x86_64-musl)testdsofailure (x86_64-musl)