Skip to content

Conversation

@WoosukKwon
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@njhill njhill added the v1 label Feb 4, 2025
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Feb 4, 2025

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be
merged. Please rebase the PR, @WoosukKwon.

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/syncing-a-fork

@mergify mergify bot added the needs-rebase label Feb 4, 2025
@wangxiyuan
Copy link
Contributor

@WoosukKwon Any plan to complete this PR? Thanks

from vllm.utils import get_exception_traceback, zmq_socket_ctx
from vllm.v1.core.kv_cache_utils import get_kv_cache_config
from vllm.v1.core.scheduler import Scheduler
from vllm.v1.core.scheduler.scheduler import Scheduler
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the intent here to also update the engine core to use a configurable type for the scheduler, now that we have an interface for it?

@GindaChen
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @WoosukKwon - I would like to take a look and this PR and see if we can continue working on this.

@WoosukKwon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@GindaChen @joerunde @wangxiyuan Sorry for the delay. I created a new PR #14731.

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon closed this Mar 13, 2025
@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon deleted the v1-scheduler-interface branch July 1, 2025 23:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants