Skip to content

Conversation

@anyesu
Copy link
Contributor

@anyesu anyesu commented Sep 4, 2023

Description

Fixes

Additional context


What is the purpose of this pull request?

  • Bug fix
  • New Feature
  • Documentation update
  • Other

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • Read the Contributing Guidelines.
  • Read the Pull Request Guidelines and follow the PR Title Convention.
  • Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
  • Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes #123).
  • Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Submitted with StackBlitz Codeflow.

@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@sapphi-red sapphi-red added p4-important Violate documented behavior or significantly improves performance (priority) feat: deps optimizer Esbuild Dependencies Optimization labels Sep 6, 2023
Copy link
Member

@sapphi-red sapphi-red left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the detailed explanation and the fix!

@patak-dev patak-dev merged commit c5f6558 into vitejs:main Sep 6, 2023
@anyesu anyesu deleted the anyesu/issue14284 branch September 7, 2023 02:55
Gaubee pushed a commit to Gaubee/vite that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2023
bluwy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@bluwy bluwy mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
bluwy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feat: deps optimizer Esbuild Dependencies Optimization p4-important Violate documented behavior or significantly improves performance (priority)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants