Import Next's CJS AsyncLocalStorage modules #3634
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The node evaluation always renders with `type: "commonjs"` and `require()` calls, so we'll always import the CJS files. But here we're importing the ESM files. That means we have 2 distinct instances of `requestAsyncStorage` in our node instance, and they cannot properly communicate with the other.
Contributor
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
8 Ignored Deployments
|
Contributor
Benchmark for 812f0b6Click to view benchmark
|
Contributor
|
sokra
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2023
Member
sokra
left a comment
sokra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could we add a test case for this to not regress on that?
Contributor
Author
|
Added test case |
jridgewell
added
the
pr: automerge
Contributor
Benchmark for 8f4927fClick to view benchmark
|
This was referenced Feb 6, 2023
timneutkens
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2023
…49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> # New Features - vercel/turborepo#3540 - vercel/turborepo#3549 - vercel/turborepo#3465 - vercel/turborepo#3550 - vercel/turborepo#3495 - vercel/turborepo#3624 - vercel/turborepo#3600 - vercel/turborepo#3676 - vercel/turborepo#3689 # Fixes - vercel/turborepo#3437 - vercel/turborepo#3542 - vercel/turborepo#3531 - vercel/turborepo#3552 - vercel/turborepo#3551 - vercel/turborepo#3597 - vercel/turborepo#3644 - vercel/turborepo#3623 - vercel/turborepo#3634 - vercel/turborepo#3574 - vercel/turborepo#3673 - vercel/turborepo#3675 - vercel/turborepo#3723 - vercel/turborepo#3677 - vercel/turborepo#3717 - vercel/turborepo#3701 # Performance Improvements - vercel/turborepo#3361 - vercel/turborepo#3619 --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
jridgewell
added a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2023
The node evaluation always renders with `type: "commonjs"` and `require()` calls, so we'll always import the CJS files. But here we're importing the ESM files. That means we have 2 distinct instances of `requestAsyncStorage` in our node instance, and they cannot properly communicate with the other. Fixes WEB-543
sokra
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2023
The node evaluation always renders with `type: "commonjs"` and `require()` calls, so we'll always import the CJS files. But here we're importing the ESM files. That means we have 2 distinct instances of `requestAsyncStorage` in our node instance, and they cannot properly communicate with the other. Fixes WEB-543
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2024
The node evaluation always renders with `type: "commonjs"` and `require()` calls, so we'll always import the CJS files. But here we're importing the ESM files. That means we have 2 distinct instances of `requestAsyncStorage` in our node instance, and they cannot properly communicate with the other. Fixes WEB-543
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
The node evaluation always renders with `type: "commonjs"` and `require()` calls, so we'll always import the CJS files. But here we're importing the ESM files. That means we have 2 distinct instances of `requestAsyncStorage` in our node instance, and they cannot properly communicate with the other. Fixes WEB-543
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2024
The node evaluation always renders with `type: "commonjs"` and `require()` calls, so we'll always import the CJS files. But here we're importing the ESM files. That means we have 2 distinct instances of `requestAsyncStorage` in our node instance, and they cannot properly communicate with the other. Fixes WEB-543
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The node evaluation always renders with
type: "commonjs"andrequire()calls, so we'll always import the CJS files. But here we're importing the ESM files. That means we have 2 distinct instances ofrequestAsyncStoragein our node instance, and they cannot properly communicate with the other.Fixes WEB-543