feat: IR passport and identityCard, respect .gitignore files

[mhf-ir]

• IR for isPassportNumber
• IR for isIdentityCard
• respect .gitignore

Checklist

• PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
• README updated (where applicable)
• Tests written (where applicable)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1595 (7e2aa16) into master (63b6162) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #1595   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          100       100           
  Lines         1843      1852    +9     
=========================================
+ Hits          1843      1852    +9     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/lib/isPassportNumber.js	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/lib/isIdentityCard.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 63b6162...7e2aa16. Read the comment docs.

[tux-tn]

Thank you for your PR @mhf-ir and sorry for the long review delay!
Your additions to isIdentityCard and isPassportNumber are good to go;
I'm not sure about adding isLuhn as a standalone validator, i don't see a big usage outside of credit card number validation (isCreditCard is already using it internally) and we should probably open this for discussion and wait for @ezkemboi , @profnandaa and the rest of the community feedback.

[mhf-ir]

@tux-tn As i Said previously isLuhn one of the most important validation that you can see in npm many version (about 50 package) of that is implemented.

• Fact 1: Validator.js need isLuhn

Forget about isCreditCard, it's Independent validation for Luhn algorithm that developers need it already. Dependency of isCreditCard is out of this PR scope.

isCreditCard might be depend on Luhn or not, but could be different issue and PR.

• Problem 1:
  isCreditCard might using isLuhn or not. So fix it in different issue/PR.

[mhf-ir]

After all I can remove isLuhn and send another issue and PR. Is that OK? @tux-tn

[tux-tn]

After all I can remove isLuhn and send another issue and PR. Is that OK? @tux-tn

it's a good compromise, it will allow us to land directly IR Passport/IdentityCard validator and open discussion concerning the new isLuhn validator (which may take some time)

[tux-tn]

LGTM 🎉
Thank you again @mhf-ir for taking the time to fix conflicts and make the necessary changes!

[tux-tn]

@mhf-ir feel free to open a new PR concerning isLuhn in order to continue the discussion

[profnandaa]

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉