Skip to content

Scaffold content for content templates serverside#19054

Merged
AndyButland merged 8 commits intorelease/15.4from
v15/fix/serverside-content-scaffolding
Apr 16, 2025
Merged

Scaffold content for content templates serverside#19054
AndyButland merged 8 commits intorelease/15.4from
v15/fix/serverside-content-scaffolding

Conversation

@kjac
Copy link
Contributor

@kjac kjac commented Apr 16, 2025

Prerequisites

  • I have added steps to test this contribution in the description below

If there's an existing issue for this PR then this fixes #18618

Description

Introduces a new endpoint to scaffold content for content templates, leveraging the existing notification handlers to obtain feature parity with V13.

@AndyButland AndyButland marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2025 10:30
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 16, 2025 10:30
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Files not reviewed (2)
  • src/Umbraco.Cms.Api.Management/OpenApi.json: Language not supported
  • tests/Umbraco.Tests.Integration/Umbraco.Tests.Integration.csproj: Language not supported

Copy link
Contributor

@iOvergaard iOvergaard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved the service call back to the data-source class to avoid adding more imports and to follow the usual pattern, converted the response to the usual interface (UmbDataSourceResponse) to avoid a breaking change.

Looks good from a FE perspective now.

@AndyButland AndyButland enabled auto-merge (squash) April 16, 2025 12:10
@AndyButland AndyButland merged commit 29c0151 into release/15.4 Apr 16, 2025
22 of 23 checks passed
@AndyButland AndyButland deleted the v15/fix/serverside-content-scaffolding branch April 16, 2025 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants