Skip to content

Conversation

@yforster
Copy link
Member

@yforster yforster commented Sep 7, 2022

No description provided.

@yforster
Copy link
Member Author

yforster commented Sep 7, 2022

Oh no, this is probably going to fail until the opam package for MetaCoq is merged (rocq-prover/opam#2288 (comment)), which in turn relies on a new release of MetaCoq (MetaRocq/metarocq#748)

@mrhaandi
Copy link
Collaborator

Oh no, this is probably going to fail until the opam package for MetaCoq is merged (coq/opam-coq-archive#2288 (comment)), which in turn relies on a new release of MetaCoq (MetaCoq/metacoq#748)

Now that the package is released, what is the state of this PR?

@yforster
Copy link
Member Author

yforster commented Nov 2, 2022

rocq-prover/opam#2370

@mrhaandi
Copy link
Collaborator

mrhaandi commented Nov 2, 2022

@yforster Note that smpl will not be necessary anymore with #176, which is ready.

@yforster yforster merged commit 201b494 into uds-psl:coq-8.16 Nov 9, 2022
@yforster yforster deleted the coq-8.16-ci branch November 9, 2022 09:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants