Document absence of SD salt overwrite#6872
Conversation
[no changelog]
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes update explanatory comments in the SD-salt storage module to clarify existing behavior during recovery operations and to document that old salt files are not overwritten with random data before being unlinked. No functional logic or control flow is modified. Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
| model | device_test | click_test | persistence_test |
|---|---|---|---|
| T2T1 | test(all) main(all) ![]() |
test(all) main(all) ![]() |
test(all) main(all) ![]() |
| T3B1 | test(all) main(all) ![]() |
test(all) main(all) ![]() |
test(all) main(all) ![]() |
| T3T1 | test(all) main(all) ![]() |
test(all) main(all) ![]() |
test(all) main(all) ![]() |
| T3W1 | test(all) main(all) ![]() |
test(all) main(all) ![]() |
test(all) main(all) ![]() |
Latest CI run: 25365445410




































Based on discussion in #6587 (comment)