-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
time: avoid traversing entries in the time wheel twice #6584
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Darksonn
merged 23 commits into
tokio-rs:master
from
wathenjiang:iterate-time-wheel-once
Jun 14, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b81ad5b
time: avoid traversing entries in time wheel twice
wathenjiang 2721fb1
fix typo
wathenjiang c63f849
add counter for entry list
wathenjiang 97f2805
fix ci
wathenjiang 4068c8b
rm unused method remove
wathenjiang cacf3aa
readd remove method
wathenjiang 935c8ff
rm derive macro of Expiration
wathenjiang dda2636
feat: update the elapsed of the wheel after polling immediately
wathenjiang 7dcfac3
delete the wrong code comments
wathenjiang 6294926
feat: only count for highest level
wathenjiang dd02dc0
fix: ci
wathenjiang 2513327
feat: use poll_count for timer wheel
wathenjiang c498659
feat: use GuardedLinkedList
wathenjiang ec32094
style: update
wathenjiang c13a9cb
style: rm pub(super)
wathenjiang ce869cf
fix: add time feature
wathenjiang 7bbfe13
fix: state issue
wathenjiang 4e13746
doc: make comments clear
wathenjiang 926729b
fix: avoid memory leack when waker panic
wathenjiang 17fc129
revert unsafe impl linked_list::Link for TimerShared
wathenjiang 7043eb2
revert STATE_DEREGISTERED check to see what will happen
wathenjiang a733a7d
revert STATE_DEREGISTERED check
wathenjiang 436a0e3
add STATE_DEREGISTERED check
wathenjiang File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm worried about panics here. What happens to entries still in the guarded list?
I think some other examples of this wrap the guarded list in something that removes all entries from the list without waking their wakers.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. We shoud ensure the list is empty before dropping it and no double panic, even if it occurs panic. I will wrap it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now, we use
EntryWaitersListinstead. It will address our purpose of memory safety.