Skip to content

Comments

Changes for Opus 4.6 and Adaptive Thinking.#183

Merged
tghamm merged 4 commits intotghamm:mainfrom
Stevoman:adaptive-thinking
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

Changes for Opus 4.6 and Adaptive Thinking.#183
tghamm merged 4 commits intotghamm:mainfrom
Stevoman:adaptive-thinking

Conversation

@Stevoman
Copy link

@Stevoman Stevoman commented Feb 9, 2026

Hi, I added new enums and objects to support Opus 4.6 and adaptive thinking.

The ThinkingParameters, OutputFormat, and new OutputConfig objects needed a bit of delicate handling to avoid breaking changes. I think I got it all right but this is my first contribution so sorry if I missed anything.

@Stevoman
Copy link
Author

Botched the unit tests build, let's try that again...

@rschili
Copy link

rschili commented Feb 12, 2026

SDK consumer here. I'm waiting for this.

@abdofallah
Copy link

@tghamm is the repo still being maintained?

@tghamm
Copy link
Owner

tghamm commented Feb 16, 2026

@abdofallah Yes. But like most oss, I do not get paid to do this, so make a best effort to fit this into my schedule.

I hope to get to it today or tomorrow.

@Stevoman
Copy link
Author

I went ahead and added Sonnet 4.6 (released yesterday) as well since it supports adaptive thinking.

@tghamm tghamm merged commit 26a8cb7 into tghamm:main Feb 19, 2026
1 check passed
@tghamm
Copy link
Owner

tghamm commented Feb 19, 2026

@Stevoman thank you for the contribution - nice work! @abdofallah would like to get a couple of small things in, coming today/tomorrow.

@abdofallah
Copy link

@abdofallah Yes. But like most oss, I do not get paid to do this, so make a best effort to fit this into my schedule.

I hope to get to it today or tomorrow.

yup completely understandable, if you are looking for maintainers we will contribute as much as possible since we utilize the library in our production apps.

Thanks for the update!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants