Skip to content

Conversation

@leobalter
Copy link
Member

Ref #2218

@leobalter leobalter requested a review from rwaldron August 7, 2019 17:33
@leobalter leobalter self-assigned this Aug 7, 2019
@leobalter leobalter force-pushed the 2218/top-level-await-first-part2 branch 4 times, most recently from db51745 to 981e817 Compare August 7, 2019 19:27
@leobalter leobalter changed the title [WIP] More tests for Top Level Await More tests for Top Level Await Aug 7, 2019
@leobalter

This comment has been minimized.

@leobalter

This comment has been minimized.

completed += 1;
}

assert.sameValue(completed, 1);

This comment was marked as resolved.

features: [top-level-await, dynamic-import]
---*/

try {} catch (await e) {}

This comment was marked as resolved.

@leobalter leobalter force-pushed the 2218/top-level-await-first-part2 branch from d284bab to 22ecbe4 Compare September 24, 2019 20:18
@leobalter leobalter force-pushed the 2218/top-level-await-first-part2 branch from 51ca779 to 9d49f72 Compare September 24, 2019 21:05
@leobalter leobalter force-pushed the 2218/top-level-await-first-part2 branch from 9d49f72 to 6952c3c Compare September 24, 2019 21:13
@leobalter
Copy link
Member Author

This is ready for review. I was able to check the tests with V8 using the TLA flag and the only failures were related to the top level for await syntax. I believe the tests remain correct.

@leobalter
Copy link
Member Author

The only missing part for TLA is checking importing modules with the TLA peaces. Otherwise, everything seems fine. I plan to add that in a follow up PR.

@rwaldron rwaldron merged commit 8d4c5f5 into tc39:master Sep 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants