Skip to content

Conversation

@eitan-weinstein
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #194.

I created a new issue within the FENDL3.x Validation Milestone for this PR that details the motivation for this new feature more specifically, but essentially, the purpose of the PR is to allow the user to ignore the stable isotopes of the irradiated target to see only new nuclides produced as a result of the reaction, whether stable or not.

@gonuke
Copy link
Member

gonuke commented Dec 10, 2025

I'm not thrilled about hard-coding the list of stable nuclides. We should be able to infer this from various data libraries, but the best solution may be to require/expect the specific activity to be generated in the ALARA run and use those results to filter the number density. (That is, if the user doesn't just look at the specific activity results, anyway.)

I guess a question for @bohmt - the motivation is to remove the stable nuclides from overwhelming the result because they aren't important for other responses, but shouldn't users just look at those other responses?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Filter Out Stable Nuclides of an Irradiated Element in Single Element Simulation

2 participants