Skip to content

[Feature Request]: Support argTypes Type Definitions #22196

@stegano

Description

@stegano

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

it seems that some field type information that may be included in argTypes seems to be missing.
For example, 'options', 'control' field, etc. These fields actually work, but can be confusing because there is no type definition.

Please let me know if I misunderstand anything.

Describe the solution you'd like

The types of fields supported by argTypes must be clear. If the function actually works, the type definition should also be included.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Are you able to assist to bring the feature to reality?

no

Additional context

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions