[route_check] fix IPv6 address handling#64
Closed
stepanblyschak wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Closed
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <[email protected]>
volodymyrsamotiy
approved these changes
Mar 7, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
In case user has configured an IPv6 address on an interface in CONFIG DB in non simplified form like 2000:31:0:0::1/64 it is present in a simplified form in ASIC_DB. This leads to route_check failure since it just compares strings.
How I did it
Convert prefix string using ip_network().
How to verify it
UT replicates the issue.
Previous command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)
New command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)