Skip to content

Remove suppress-fib-pending CLI and make route_check.py check suppress-fib in BGP configuration#3331

Merged
arlakshm merged 6 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
stepanblyschak:revert-suppress-fib
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

Remove suppress-fib-pending CLI and make route_check.py check suppress-fib in BGP configuration#3331
arlakshm merged 6 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
stepanblyschak:revert-suppress-fib

Conversation

@stepanblyschak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What I did

Revert suppress FIB pending feature

Why I did it

Some unresolved FRR issues in current version

How I verified it

Build and run

Previous command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)

New command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)

@stepanblyschak stepanblyschak force-pushed the revert-suppress-fib branch 2 times, most recently from 50eb155 to f9c5c38 Compare May 23, 2024 15:48
@stepanblyschak stepanblyschak marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2024 15:48
@stepanblyschak stepanblyschak changed the title Revert suppress FIB pending feature Remove suppress-fib-pending CLI and make route_check.py check suppress-fib in BGP configuration May 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <[email protected]>
abdosi
abdosi previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2024
@abdosi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

abdosi commented Jun 25, 2024

@stepanblyschak : Please help resolveconflict.

@anamehra for viz.

@arlakshm arlakshm merged commit 06965df into sonic-net:master Jul 1, 2024
yejianquan pushed a commit to yejianquan/sonic-utilities that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2024
…s-fib in BGP configuration (sonic-net#3331)

What I did

Revert suppress FIB pending feature

Why I did it

Some unresolved FRR issues in current version

How I verified it

Build and run [route_check] check if suppress fib is enabled in bgp

Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <[email protected]>
yejianquan pushed a commit to yejianquan/sonic-utilities that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2024
…s-fib in BGP configuration (sonic-net#3331)

What I did

Revert suppress FIB pending feature

Why I did it

Some unresolved FRR issues in current version

How I verified it

Build and run [route_check] check if suppress fib is enabled in bgp

Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <[email protected]>
yejianquan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
…s-fib in BGP configuration (#3331) (#3391)

What I did
Cherry-pick #3331 to 202405 and resolve conflicts
Revert suppress FIB pending feature

Why I did it

Some unresolved FRR issues in current version

How I verified it

Build and run [route_check] check if suppress fib is enabled in bgp

Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stepan Blyshchak <[email protected]>
co-authorized by: [email protected]
StormLiangMS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
… suppress-fib in BGP configuration" (#3477)

Reverts #3331
BGP zebra enhancements is merged to master branch sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#19717

Reverting the revert of bgp suppress pending feature to enable it in master branch
nmoray pushed a commit to nmoray/sonic-utilities that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
…s-fib in BGP configuration (sonic-net#3331)

What I did

Revert suppress FIB pending feature

Why I did it

Some unresolved FRR issues in current version

How I verified it

Build and run [route_check] check if suppress fib is enabled in bgp

Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <[email protected]>
nmoray pushed a commit to nmoray/sonic-utilities that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
… suppress-fib in BGP configuration" (sonic-net#3477)

Reverts sonic-net#3331
BGP zebra enhancements is merged to master branch sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#19717

Reverting the revert of bgp suppress pending feature to enable it in master branch
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants