Conversation
|
retest this please |
|
retest this please |
|
@prsunny , can you rebase your pr and do a test again? I fixed a few things on the vstest. |
|
retest this please |
|
is the vs test in this PR or a new PR? |
lguohan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
refactor test cases to make it more readable.
|
I see two functions with the same name, but with different signatures. If you need both functions I'd suggest to change names, otherwise you'd better to remove unused one. vs |
…ure to adopt to new changes
|
@pavel-shirshov , addressed the comment by combining the two APIs. Initially thought to leave the existing function unmodified. There are new changes to the PR based on VNET Table flow redesign. The new flow is updated in the HLD document. |
jipanyang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Have you updated Application DB schema with VXLAN_TUNNEL_MAP in swss-schema.md?
…t#643) * [syncd] ARM32 bit fixes, for 64bit printf format specifier. Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Pennadam Ramamoorthy <[email protected]> * [syncd] ARM32 bit fixes, for 64bit printf format specifier. Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Pennadam Ramamoorthy <[email protected]>
* Vnetvxlan changes * VS test case for Vnet/Vxlan * Addressed review comments, fixed a VS test case * Modifications based on feedback for VNET Table flow, VS test restructure to adopt to new changes * Schema updated for App DB
What I did
Modified Vxlanorch to support VNet peering feature.
Introduced the following:
Why I did it
Support VNet peering using Vxlan (VNI <-> VRF)
How I verified it
Verified by VS test and checking the ASIC DB for intended SAI tables
Details if related
Design Document:
https://github.com/prsunny/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/doc/vxlan/Vxlan_hld.md
Related PR
#632
Pending: