Skip to content

Adding gitignore file#4

Merged
stcheng merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
stcheng:master
Mar 17, 2016
Merged

Adding gitignore file#4
stcheng merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
stcheng:master

Conversation

@stcheng
Copy link
Contributor

@stcheng stcheng commented Mar 16, 2016

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Shuotian Cheng <shuche@microsoft.com>
@eladraz
Copy link
Contributor

eladraz commented Mar 16, 2016

I would split the get_deps.sh file into two:
One for FPM (and hopefully adding SAI dependancies as well)
Other for debian packages (BTW, why don't we use apt-get?).

The main reason is to support other distribution, such as redhat and fedora.

@stcheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

stcheng commented Mar 17, 2016

So this pull request will only contain gitignore. I'll submit another one for get_deps.sh

@stcheng stcheng changed the title Adding gitignore file and get_deps file Adding gitignore file Mar 17, 2016
@stcheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

stcheng commented Mar 17, 2016

The reason I do not use apt-get is that the redis / hiredis version we're using is the latest one and the regular apt-get cannot get this version.
Another solution is to put the instructions in the README.md file, where we have

sudo apt-key adv --keyserver apt-mo.trafficmanager.net --recv-keys 417A0893
echo 'deb http://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/sonic/ trusty main' | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list.d/sonic.list
sudo apt-get update

We could do sudo apt-get install redis and apt-get install hiredis after then.

@stcheng stcheng merged commit f93168f into sonic-net:master Mar 17, 2016
marian-pritsak pushed a commit to marian-pritsak/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2018
ishidawataru pushed a commit to ishidawataru/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2018
dgsudharsan referenced this pull request in dgsudharsan/sonic-swss Jun 11, 2021
kktheballer pushed a commit to kktheballer/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2021
* Add matchmode changes without compilation or tests

* Resolve compilation issues and ensure base fg test is passing

* Add unit tests for matchmode
EdenGri referenced this pull request in EdenGri/sonic-swss Feb 28, 2022
oleksandrivantsiv referenced this pull request in oleksandrivantsiv/sonic-swss Mar 1, 2023
lukasstockner pushed a commit to genesiscloud/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2023
…onic-net#4)

With adding more columns into the port_config.ini file, the previous
logic of checking len(line.split()) == 4 is no longer valid. With
adding the logic of parsing the title of the file, the port index
could be directly retrieved depending on which column it is.

Signed-off-by: Shu0T1an ChenG <shuche@microsoft.com>
qiluo-msft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2023
**What I did**

Fix the Mem Leak by moving the raw pointers in type_maps to use smart pointers

**Why I did it**

```
Indirect leak of 83776 byte(s) in 476 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f0a2a414647 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:99
    #1 0x5555590cc923 in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::allocate(unsigned long, void const*) /usr/include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:115
    #2 0x5555590cc923 in std::allocator_traits, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > > >::allocate(std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >&, unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:460
    #3 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_get_node() /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:584
    #4 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_node, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >* std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_create_node, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:634
    #5 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_emplace_hint_unique, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:2461
    #6 0x5555590e8757 in std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::operator[](std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_map.h:501
    #7 0x5555590d48b0 in Orch::setObjectReference(std::map, std::allocator >, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*> > >&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) orchagent/orch.cpp:450
    #8 0x5555594ff66b in QosOrch::handleQueueTable(Consumer&, std::tuple, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >, std::vector, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > > > > >&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:1763
    #9 0x5555594edbd6 in QosOrch::doTask(Consumer&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:2179
    #10 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:241
    #11 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:238
    #12 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::execute() orchagent/orch.cpp:235
    #13 0x555559090dad in OrchDaemon::start() orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:755
    #14 0x555558e9be25 in main orchagent/main.cpp:766
    #15 0x7f0a299b6d09 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x23d09)
```
StormLiangMS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
**What I did**

Fix the Mem Leak by moving the raw pointers in type_maps to use smart pointers

**Why I did it**

```
Indirect leak of 83776 byte(s) in 476 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f0a2a414647 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:99
    #1 0x5555590cc923 in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::allocate(unsigned long, void const*) /usr/include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:115
    #2 0x5555590cc923 in std::allocator_traits, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > > >::allocate(std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >&, unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:460
    #3 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_get_node() /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:584
    #4 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_node, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >* std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_create_node, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:634
    #5 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_emplace_hint_unique, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:2461
    #6 0x5555590e8757 in std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::operator[](std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_map.h:501
    #7 0x5555590d48b0 in Orch::setObjectReference(std::map, std::allocator >, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*> > >&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) orchagent/orch.cpp:450
    #8 0x5555594ff66b in QosOrch::handleQueueTable(Consumer&, std::tuple, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >, std::vector, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > > > > >&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:1763
    #9 0x5555594edbd6 in QosOrch::doTask(Consumer&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:2179
    #10 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:241
    #11 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:238
    #12 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::execute() orchagent/orch.cpp:235
    #13 0x555559090dad in OrchDaemon::start() orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:755
    #14 0x555558e9be25 in main orchagent/main.cpp:766
    #15 0x7f0a299b6d09 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x23d09)
```
StormLiangMS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
**What I did**

Fix the Mem Leak by moving the raw pointers in type_maps to use smart pointers

**Why I did it**

```
Indirect leak of 83776 byte(s) in 476 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f0a2a414647 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:99
    #1 0x5555590cc923 in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::allocate(unsigned long, void const*) /usr/include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:115
    #2 0x5555590cc923 in std::allocator_traits, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > > >::allocate(std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >&, unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:460
    #3 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_get_node() /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:584
    #4 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_node, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >* std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_create_node, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:634
    #5 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_emplace_hint_unique, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:2461
    #6 0x5555590e8757 in std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::operator[](std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_map.h:501
    #7 0x5555590d48b0 in Orch::setObjectReference(std::map, std::allocator >, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*> > >&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) orchagent/orch.cpp:450
    #8 0x5555594ff66b in QosOrch::handleQueueTable(Consumer&, std::tuple, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >, std::vector, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > > > > >&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:1763
    #9 0x5555594edbd6 in QosOrch::doTask(Consumer&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:2179
    #10 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:241
    #11 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:238
    #12 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::execute() orchagent/orch.cpp:235
    #13 0x555559090dad in OrchDaemon::start() orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:755
    #14 0x555558e9be25 in main orchagent/main.cpp:766
    #15 0x7f0a299b6d09 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x23d09)
```
vmittal-msft added a commit to vmittal-msft/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2023
mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
…tries in gRouteBulker

<!--
Please make sure you have read and understood the contribution guildlines:
https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

1. Make sure your commit includes a signature generted with `git commit -s`
2. Make sure your commit title follows the correct format: [component]: description
3. Make sure your commit message contains enough details about the change and related tests
4. Make sure your pull request adds related reviewers, asignees, labels

Please also provide the following information in this pull request:
-->

**What I did**

Avoid removing a VRF routing table when there are pending creation entries in gRouteBulker

1. Remove a VRF routing table when a routing entry is removed only if there is no pending creation entry in gRouteBulker
2. Avoid uninitialized value SAI IP address/prefix structure

**Why I did it**

Fix issue: out of range exception can be thrown in `addRoutePost` due to non exist VRF

```
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007f5791aedebc in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007f5791a9efb2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
sonic-net#2  0x00007f5791a89472 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
sonic-net#3  0x00007f5791de0919 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#4  0x00007f5791debe1a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#5  0x00007f5791debe85 in std::terminate() () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#6  0x00007f5791dec0d8 in __cxa_throw () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#7  0x00007f5791de3240 in std::__throw_out_of_range(char const*) () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#8  0x00005594e856d956 in std::map<unsigned long, std::map<swss::IpPrefix, RouteNhg, std::less<swss::IpPrefix>, std::allocator<std::pair<swss::IpPrefix const, RouteNhg> > >, std::less<unsigned long>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned long const, std::map<swss::IpPrefix, RouteNhg, std::less<swss::IpPrefix>, std::allocator<std::pair<swss::IpPrefix const, RouteNhg> > > > > >::at (this=<optimized out>, __k=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/stl_map.h:551
sonic-net#9  0x00005594e8564beb in RouteOrch::addRoutePost (this=this@entry=0x5594ea13e080, ctx=..., nextHops=...) at ./orchagent/routeorch.cpp:2145
sonic-net#10 0x00005594e856b0b2 in RouteOrch::doTask (this=0x5594ea13e080, consumer=...) at ./orchagent/routeorch.cpp:1021
sonic-net#11 0x00005594e85282d2 in Orch::doTask (this=0x5594ea13e080) at ./orchagent/orch.cpp:553
sonic-net#12 0x00005594e851909a in OrchDaemon::start (this=this@entry=0x5594ea0a0950) at ./orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:895
sonic-net#13 0x00005594e8485632 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at ./orchagent/main.cpp:818
```

**How I verified it**

Unit (mock) test

**Details if related**

Originally, it cleaned up a VRF routing table whenever a prefix of the VRF was removed if
1. there was no routing entry in the VRF routing table and
2. the prefix was not pending creation in gRouteBulker

The motivation is to remove a VRF routing table if there is no routing entry in the VRF and no routing entry pending creation for that VRF. However, condition 2 does not guarantee that.

The ideal way of the 2nd condition is to check pending creation entries of a certain VRF, which we can not do.
So, we are using strict conditions here as the following:
1. there is no routing entry in the VRF routing table and
2. there is no pending creating routing entry in gRouteBulker regardless of which VRF it belongs to
mssonicbld added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
…tries in gRouteBulker (#3493)

<!--
Please make sure you have read and understood the contribution guildlines:
https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

1. Make sure your commit includes a signature generted with `git commit -s`
2. Make sure your commit title follows the correct format: [component]: description
3. Make sure your commit message contains enough details about the change and related tests
4. Make sure your pull request adds related reviewers, asignees, labels

Please also provide the following information in this pull request:
-->

**What I did**

Avoid removing a VRF routing table when there are pending creation entries in gRouteBulker

1. Remove a VRF routing table when a routing entry is removed only if there is no pending creation entry in gRouteBulker
2. Avoid uninitialized value SAI IP address/prefix structure

**Why I did it**

Fix issue: out of range exception can be thrown in `addRoutePost` due to non exist VRF

```
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f5791aedebc in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f5791a9efb2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007f5791a89472 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#3 0x00007f5791de0919 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#4 0x00007f5791debe1a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#5 0x00007f5791debe85 in std::terminate() () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#6 0x00007f5791dec0d8 in __cxa_throw () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#7 0x00007f5791de3240 in std::__throw_out_of_range(char const*) () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#8 0x00005594e856d956 in std::map<unsigned long, std::map<swss::IpPrefix, RouteNhg, std::less<swss::IpPrefix>, std::allocator<std::pair<swss::IpPrefix const, RouteNhg> > >, std::less<unsigned long>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned long const, std::map<swss::IpPrefix, RouteNhg, std::less<swss::IpPrefix>, std::allocator<std::pair<swss::IpPrefix const, RouteNhg> > > > > >::at (this=<optimized out>, __k=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/stl_map.h:551
#9 0x00005594e8564beb in RouteOrch::addRoutePost (this=this@entry=0x5594ea13e080, ctx=..., nextHops=...) at ./orchagent/routeorch.cpp:2145
#10 0x00005594e856b0b2 in RouteOrch::doTask (this=0x5594ea13e080, consumer=...) at ./orchagent/routeorch.cpp:1021
#11 0x00005594e85282d2 in Orch::doTask (this=0x5594ea13e080) at ./orchagent/orch.cpp:553
#12 0x00005594e851909a in OrchDaemon::start (this=this@entry=0x5594ea0a0950) at ./orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:895
#13 0x00005594e8485632 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at ./orchagent/main.cpp:818
```

**How I verified it**

Unit (mock) test

**Details if related**

Originally, it cleaned up a VRF routing table whenever a prefix of the VRF was removed if
1. there was no routing entry in the VRF routing table and
2. the prefix was not pending creation in gRouteBulker

The motivation is to remove a VRF routing table if there is no routing entry in the VRF and no routing entry pending creation for that VRF. However, condition 2 does not guarantee that.

The ideal way of the 2nd condition is to check pending creation entries of a certain VRF, which we can not do.
So, we are using strict conditions here as the following:
1. there is no routing entry in the VRF routing table and
2. there is no pending creating routing entry in gRouteBulker regardless of which VRF it belongs to
mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
…tries in gRouteBulker

<!--
Please make sure you have read and understood the contribution guildlines:
https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

1. Make sure your commit includes a signature generted with `git commit -s`
2. Make sure your commit title follows the correct format: [component]: description
3. Make sure your commit message contains enough details about the change and related tests
4. Make sure your pull request adds related reviewers, asignees, labels

Please also provide the following information in this pull request:
-->

**What I did**

Avoid removing a VRF routing table when there are pending creation entries in gRouteBulker

1. Remove a VRF routing table when a routing entry is removed only if there is no pending creation entry in gRouteBulker
2. Avoid uninitialized value SAI IP address/prefix structure

**Why I did it**

Fix issue: out of range exception can be thrown in `addRoutePost` due to non exist VRF

```
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007f5791aedebc in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007f5791a9efb2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
sonic-net#2  0x00007f5791a89472 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
sonic-net#3  0x00007f5791de0919 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#4  0x00007f5791debe1a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#5  0x00007f5791debe85 in std::terminate() () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#6  0x00007f5791dec0d8 in __cxa_throw () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#7  0x00007f5791de3240 in std::__throw_out_of_range(char const*) () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
sonic-net#8  0x00005594e856d956 in std::map<unsigned long, std::map<swss::IpPrefix, RouteNhg, std::less<swss::IpPrefix>, std::allocator<std::pair<swss::IpPrefix const, RouteNhg> > >, std::less<unsigned long>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned long const, std::map<swss::IpPrefix, RouteNhg, std::less<swss::IpPrefix>, std::allocator<std::pair<swss::IpPrefix const, RouteNhg> > > > > >::at (this=<optimized out>, __k=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/stl_map.h:551
sonic-net#9  0x00005594e8564beb in RouteOrch::addRoutePost (this=this@entry=0x5594ea13e080, ctx=..., nextHops=...) at ./orchagent/routeorch.cpp:2145
sonic-net#10 0x00005594e856b0b2 in RouteOrch::doTask (this=0x5594ea13e080, consumer=...) at ./orchagent/routeorch.cpp:1021
sonic-net#11 0x00005594e85282d2 in Orch::doTask (this=0x5594ea13e080) at ./orchagent/orch.cpp:553
sonic-net#12 0x00005594e851909a in OrchDaemon::start (this=this@entry=0x5594ea0a0950) at ./orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:895
sonic-net#13 0x00005594e8485632 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at ./orchagent/main.cpp:818
```

**How I verified it**

Unit (mock) test

**Details if related**

Originally, it cleaned up a VRF routing table whenever a prefix of the VRF was removed if
1. there was no routing entry in the VRF routing table and
2. the prefix was not pending creation in gRouteBulker

The motivation is to remove a VRF routing table if there is no routing entry in the VRF and no routing entry pending creation for that VRF. However, condition 2 does not guarantee that.

The ideal way of the 2nd condition is to check pending creation entries of a certain VRF, which we can not do.
So, we are using strict conditions here as the following:
1. there is no routing entry in the VRF routing table and
2. there is no pending creating routing entry in gRouteBulker regardless of which VRF it belongs to
mssonicbld added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
…tries in gRouteBulker (#3526)

<!--
Please make sure you have read and understood the contribution guildlines:
https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

1. Make sure your commit includes a signature generted with `git commit -s`
2. Make sure your commit title follows the correct format: [component]: description
3. Make sure your commit message contains enough details about the change and related tests
4. Make sure your pull request adds related reviewers, asignees, labels

Please also provide the following information in this pull request:
-->

**What I did**

Avoid removing a VRF routing table when there are pending creation entries in gRouteBulker

1. Remove a VRF routing table when a routing entry is removed only if there is no pending creation entry in gRouteBulker
2. Avoid uninitialized value SAI IP address/prefix structure

**Why I did it**

Fix issue: out of range exception can be thrown in `addRoutePost` due to non exist VRF

```
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f5791aedebc in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f5791a9efb2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007f5791a89472 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#3 0x00007f5791de0919 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#4 0x00007f5791debe1a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#5 0x00007f5791debe85 in std::terminate() () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#6 0x00007f5791dec0d8 in __cxa_throw () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#7 0x00007f5791de3240 in std::__throw_out_of_range(char const*) () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#8 0x00005594e856d956 in std::map<unsigned long, std::map<swss::IpPrefix, RouteNhg, std::less<swss::IpPrefix>, std::allocator<std::pair<swss::IpPrefix const, RouteNhg> > >, std::less<unsigned long>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned long const, std::map<swss::IpPrefix, RouteNhg, std::less<swss::IpPrefix>, std::allocator<std::pair<swss::IpPrefix const, RouteNhg> > > > > >::at (this=<optimized out>, __k=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/stl_map.h:551
#9 0x00005594e8564beb in RouteOrch::addRoutePost (this=this@entry=0x5594ea13e080, ctx=..., nextHops=...) at ./orchagent/routeorch.cpp:2145
#10 0x00005594e856b0b2 in RouteOrch::doTask (this=0x5594ea13e080, consumer=...) at ./orchagent/routeorch.cpp:1021
#11 0x00005594e85282d2 in Orch::doTask (this=0x5594ea13e080) at ./orchagent/orch.cpp:553
#12 0x00005594e851909a in OrchDaemon::start (this=this@entry=0x5594ea0a0950) at ./orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:895
#13 0x00005594e8485632 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at ./orchagent/main.cpp:818
```

**How I verified it**

Unit (mock) test

**Details if related**

Originally, it cleaned up a VRF routing table whenever a prefix of the VRF was removed if
1. there was no routing entry in the VRF routing table and
2. the prefix was not pending creation in gRouteBulker

The motivation is to remove a VRF routing table if there is no routing entry in the VRF and no routing entry pending creation for that VRF. However, condition 2 does not guarantee that.

The ideal way of the 2nd condition is to check pending creation entries of a certain VRF, which we can not do.
So, we are using strict conditions here as the following:
1. there is no routing entry in the VRF routing table and
2. there is no pending creating routing entry in gRouteBulker regardless of which VRF it belongs to
mukeshmv pushed a commit to mukeshmv/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2025
Avoid portsToRemoveList generation for helios_vs platform where (bcm-asic-model) ports removable causes docker de-stabilization
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants