Conversation
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 1737 in repo Azure/sonic-swss |
|
@prsunny help forward，have rebuild done! |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/Azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/Azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
hi @prsunny @theasianpianist help forward this, thanks! |
|
/Azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@xumia , could you please sign-off ? |
kcudnik
left a comment
kcudnik
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
after this will be merged, may we check how much coverage this will generate for sonic-sairedis repo ? currently sairedis repo only runs local unittests which cover about 60% of the code, maybe running docker tests will bump that number up
|
@pettershao-ragilenetworks hey, can we try use this approach on sonic-sairedis repo ? to find out what coverage could be achieved, since current unittest cover on sairedis repo in 60%, i will write mail |
OK! |
Signed-off-by: bingwang <[email protected]>
include changes: 0031470 | improve enum values integration check (sonic-net#1727) (sonic-net#1737) Signed-off-by: richardyu-ms <[email protected]>
* [gcov] swss support gcov * Introduce gcov-related automation script to test coverage rate for swss module Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
7 participants
What I did
Introduce gcov-related automation script to test coverage rate for swss module
relate HLD: sonic-net/SONiC#642
Why I did it
Attempt to integrate coverage report for each module in SONiC to Azure pipeline
How I verified it
Using Azure pipeline to check whether a coverage report can be checked after a pull request
Details if related