Skip to content

Move QoS configuration to config DB#158

Merged
yxieca merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
andriymoroz-mlnx:qos_config
Nov 21, 2017
Merged

Move QoS configuration to config DB#158
yxieca merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
andriymoroz-mlnx:qos_config

Conversation

@andriymoroz-mlnx
Copy link
Collaborator

@andriymoroz-mlnx andriymoroz-mlnx commented Nov 10, 2017

Signed-off-by: Andriy Moroz <c_andriym@mellanox.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@yxieca yxieca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like you need to take 3 steps for this change:

  1. Adding new fields (CFG_) that you need. But keep the old APP_ for now, You can group them together and add a comment for future deprecation if you like to.
  2. Once this review is in, test for #378 could pass. Then we can merge that review.
  3. Then you can create another PR to remove the old APP_* entries.

Without doing this in small steps, i don't think PR #378 would pass test. Unless someone can ignore test result and merge it, we are stuck.

Regards,
Ying

@yxieca
Copy link
Contributor

yxieca commented Nov 20, 2017

Discussed with Shuotian, this review doesn't have to be broken into 2.

However, #1162 needs to include submodule updates to avoid build failure.

Signed-off-by: Andriy Moroz <c_andriym@mellanox.com>
@yxieca yxieca merged commit 3d07426 into sonic-net:master Nov 21, 2017
prgeor pushed a commit to prgeor/sonic-swss-common that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2025
…g Loopback, PRBS modes on the Y cable (sonic-net#158)

* [sonic_y_cable] Add support for measuring BER and EYE scan
 with Loopback, PRBS and Mission modes.

What is the motivation for this PR?
To add the necessary support for measuring BER and EYE scan, and run PRBS/Loopback modes on the Y cable 

How did you do it?
Added the changes in sonic-platform-common module in the y_cable.py file

How did you verify/test it?
opened a python shell and ran the API's manually and test verified
the values are correct.

Signed-off-by: vaibhav-dahiya <vdahiya@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants