Create TRANSCEIVER_DOM_THRESHOLD table in state DB

[mihirpat1]

Description

This PR is adding the required changes for creating a table for DOM threshold in state DB. Please refer to CMIS_and_C-CMIS_support_for_ZR.md document for field definitions for TRANSCEIVER_DOM_THRESHOLD.
Overall, TRANSCEIVER_DOM_SENSOR DB table currently comprised of fields for TRANSCEIVER_DOM_SENSOR as well as TRANSCEIVER_DOM_THRESHOLD. With the current PR, a separate entry in state DB has now been created for TRANSCEIVER_DOM_THRESHOLD related fields.
The new command to display the threshold relevant fields will be done separately and is currently being tracked using sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#12911.

PR sonic-net/sonic-utilities#2535 has now been created to ensure that the output from "show interface transceiver eeprom <port> -d" remains unchanged after the current PR is merged. Both the current PR and sonic-net/sonic-utilities#2535 needs to be merged at the same time to avoid running into issues since they are dependent.

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

400ZR related testing
Unit-test_400ZR.txt

100G and 10G related testing
Unit-test_100G_10G.txt

Transceiver info o/p
Unit-test_transceiver_info.txt

400ZR UT for multi-asic switch
Unit-test_400ZR_Multiasic.txt

Additional Information (Optional)

Signed-off-by: Mihir Patel [email protected]

[shyam77git]

@mihirpat1
Looked into the UT logs.
Don't see output/display for 'show int transceiver eeprom' CLIs with this change.
Could you add them?

[mihirpat1]

@mihirpat1 Looked into the UT logs. Don't see output/display for 'show int transceiver eeprom' CLIs with this change. Could you add them?

The current PR is only for supporting the state DB related changes. I have filed sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#12911 to track the CLI support for the same.

[jaganbal-a]

I see the o/p of "sfpshow eeprom -d -p port_name" have "ModuleThresholdValues:" and looks incomplete.
Do you want to keep the CLI o/p this way until sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#12911 fix commit?
ModuleMonitorValues:
Temperature: 73.91C
Vcc: 3.347Volts
ModuleThresholdValues:

root@sonic:/home/admin# 

[mihirpat1]

I see the o/p of "sfpshow eeprom -d -p port_name" have "ModuleThresholdValues:" and looks incomplete. Do you want to keep the CLI o/p this way until sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#12911 fix commit? ModuleMonitorValues: Temperature: 73.91C Vcc: 3.347Volts ModuleThresholdValues:

root@sonic:/home/admin# 

Yes, the corresponding changes will be done with the issue mentioned above

[jaganbal-a]

I see the o/p of "sfpshow eeprom -d -p port_name" have "ModuleThresholdValues:" and looks incomplete. Do you want to keep the CLI o/p this way until sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#12911 fix commit? ModuleMonitorValues: Temperature: 73.91C Vcc: 3.347Volts ModuleThresholdValues:

root@sonic:/home/admin# 

Yes, the corresponding changes will be done with the issue mentioned above

the show int trans CLI o/p will have the Module threshold values right?
otherwise it will be difficult to debug any signal out of range scenario.

[mihirpat1]

I see the o/p of "sfpshow eeprom -d -p port_name" have "ModuleThresholdValues:" and looks incomplete. Do you want to keep the CLI o/p this way until sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#12911 fix commit? ModuleMonitorValues: Temperature: 73.91C Vcc: 3.347Volts ModuleThresholdValues:

root@sonic:/home/admin# 

Yes, the corresponding changes will be done with the issue mentioned above

the show int trans CLI o/p will have the Module threshold values right? otherwise it will be difficult to debug any signal out of range scenario.

Need access since part of SONiC teamI have now raised sonic-net/sonic-utilities#2535 to ensure that the CLI output remains unchanged with the current changes. We plan to commit both this and sonic-net/sonic-utilities#2535 at the same time to avoid running into dependency issues.

[shyam77git]

@mihirpat1
Have added comment to PR sonic-net/sonic-utilities#2535. Please take care of it.
Approving this one

[shyam77git]

LGTM

[mihirpat1]

@mihirpat1 Have added comment to PR sonic-net/sonic-utilities#2535. Please take care of it. Approving this one

I have added the requested UT enclosure to this PR now.