Skip to content

[action] [PR:6487] Remove bypass on duplicate lanes' platforms for GCU tests#9702

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202205from
mssonicbld:cherry/202205/6487
Aug 28, 2023
Merged

[action] [PR:6487] Remove bypass on duplicate lanes' platforms for GCU tests#9702
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202205from
mssonicbld:cherry/202205/6487

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary: Duplicate lane check was added in sonic-utilities. Remove that in sonic-mgmt.
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

The GCU-related tests were bypassed in duplicate lanes' platforms. We don't want to skip GCU tests on such platforms.
So we update the unique lane check and simply bypass the check for such platforms in GCU feature.
Now the GCU tests can be tested on such platforms.

How did you do it?

Fix in GCU feature.
sonic-net/sonic-utilities#2343 has been updated to sonic-buildimage.

How did you verify/test it?

Run e2e test in specific platform.

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Summary: Duplicate lane check was added in sonic-utilities. Remove that in sonic-mgmt.
What is the motivation for this PR?
The GCU-related tests were bypassed in duplicate lanes' platforms. We don't want to skip GCU tests on such platforms.
So we update the unique lane check and simply bypass the check for such platforms in GCU feature.
Now the GCU tests can be tested on such platforms.

How did you do it?
Fix in GCU feature.
sonic-net/sonic-utilities#2343 has been updated to sonic-buildimage.

How did you verify/test it?
Run e2e test in specific platform.
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #6487

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit eed64b0 into sonic-net:202205 Aug 28, 2023
@mssonicbld mssonicbld deleted the cherry/202205/6487 branch February 4, 2024 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants