Skip to content

[chassis] skip test_auto_techsupport.py for multi asic LC#8171

Merged
arlakshm merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
arlakshm:arlakshm/github/skip_auto_tech
May 30, 2023
Merged

[chassis] skip test_auto_techsupport.py for multi asic LC#8171
arlakshm merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
arlakshm:arlakshm/github/skip_auto_tech

Conversation

@arlakshm
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • [ x] Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

The show auto techsupport commands does not work for multi asic devices.
skipping the test till the command failure is fix

How did you do it?

add a check to skip show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py for multi asic cards.

How did you verify/test it?

show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_sanity SKIPPED                                                                               [ 25%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_rate_limit_interval SKIPPED                                                                  [ 50%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_max_limit[techsupport] SKIPPED                                                               [ 75%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_max_limit[core] SKIPPED                                                                      [100%]

---------------------------------------------------------- generated xml file: /data/my_mgmt/tests/logs/tr.xml ----------------------------------------------------------
======================================================================== short test summary info ========================================================================
SKIPPED [2] show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py: auto techsupport on multi asic platforms doesnt work
SKIPPED [2] show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py:358: auto techsupport on multi asic platforms doesn't work

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Signed-off-by: Arvindsrinivasan Lakshminarasimhan <[email protected]>
abdosi
abdosi previously approved these changes May 8, 2023
mlok-nokia
mlok-nokia previously approved these changes May 9, 2023
…s_testing_latest' into arlakshm/internal-202205/chassis_testing_latest

Signed-off-by: Arvindsrinivasan Lakshminarasimhan <[email protected]>
@arlakshm arlakshm dismissed stale reviews from mlok-nokia and abdosi via 4fc87c6 May 19, 2023 20:22
@arlakshm arlakshm merged commit 4471339 into sonic-net:master May 30, 2023
wangxin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2023
What is the motivation for this PR?
The show auto techsupport commands does not work for multi asic devices.
skipping the test till the command failure is fix

How did you do it?
add a check to skip show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py for multi asic cards.

How did you verify/test it?
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_sanity SKIPPED                                                                               [ 25%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_rate_limit_interval SKIPPED                                                                  [ 50%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_max_limit[techsupport] SKIPPED                                                               [ 75%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_max_limit[core] SKIPPED                                                                      [100%]

---------------------------------------------------------- generated xml file: /data/my_mgmt/tests/logs/tr.xml ----------------------------------------------------------
======================================================================== short test summary info ========================================================================
SKIPPED [2] show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py: auto techsupport on multi asic platforms doesnt work
SKIPPED [2] show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py:358: auto techsupport on multi asic platforms doesn't work

Signed-off-by: Arvindsrinivasan Lakshminarasimhan <[email protected]>
@kenneth-arista
Copy link
Contributor

This is related to buffer profile changes from this PR: sonic-net/sonic-swss#2618. I believe the actual fix is to update the BUFFER_QUEUE YANG to account for the new key format.

mrkcmo pushed a commit to Azarack/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2023
)

What is the motivation for this PR?
The show auto techsupport commands does not work for multi asic devices.
skipping the test till the command failure is fix

How did you do it?
add a check to skip show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py for multi asic cards.

How did you verify/test it?
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_sanity SKIPPED                                                                               [ 25%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_rate_limit_interval SKIPPED                                                                  [ 50%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_max_limit[techsupport] SKIPPED                                                               [ 75%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_max_limit[core] SKIPPED                                                                      [100%]

---------------------------------------------------------- generated xml file: /data/my_mgmt/tests/logs/tr.xml ----------------------------------------------------------
======================================================================== short test summary info ========================================================================
SKIPPED [2] show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py: auto techsupport on multi asic platforms doesnt work
SKIPPED [2] show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py:358: auto techsupport on multi asic platforms doesn't work

Signed-off-by: Arvindsrinivasan Lakshminarasimhan <[email protected]>
AharonMalkin pushed a commit to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
)

What is the motivation for this PR?
The show auto techsupport commands does not work for multi asic devices.
skipping the test till the command failure is fix

How did you do it?
add a check to skip show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py for multi asic cards.

How did you verify/test it?
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_sanity SKIPPED                                                                               [ 25%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_rate_limit_interval SKIPPED                                                                  [ 50%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_max_limit[techsupport] SKIPPED                                                               [ 75%]
show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py::TestAutoTechSupport::test_max_limit[core] SKIPPED                                                                      [100%]

---------------------------------------------------------- generated xml file: /data/my_mgmt/tests/logs/tr.xml ----------------------------------------------------------
======================================================================== short test summary info ========================================================================
SKIPPED [2] show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py: auto techsupport on multi asic platforms doesnt work
SKIPPED [2] show_techsupport/test_auto_techsupport.py:358: auto techsupport on multi asic platforms doesn't work

Signed-off-by: Arvindsrinivasan Lakshminarasimhan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants