Skip to content

[dualtor] Adding test for multiple nexthop routes#7600

Closed
Ndancejic wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Ndancejic:multi_nexthop
Closed

[dualtor] Adding test for multiple nexthop routes#7600
Ndancejic wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Ndancejic:multi_nexthop

Conversation

@Ndancejic
Copy link
Contributor

What I did: added tests/dualtor/test_multi_mux_nexthop_route.py which tests use case of multiple nexthop neighbors across different MUX ports.

DEPENDS ON: sonic-net/sonic-swss#2656

Why I did it: test coverage of this scenario

How I did it: test creates route to 2 different interfaces and neighbors, then validates that traffic is recieved from the expected ports.

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

What I did: added tests/dualtor/test_multi_mux_nexthop_route.py which tests use case of multiple nexthop neighbors across different MUX ports.

DEPENDS ON: sonic-net/sonic-swss#2656

How did you do it?

Why I did it: test coverage of this scenario

How did you verify/test it?

How I did it: test creates route to 2 different interfaces and neighbors, then validates that traffic is recieved from the expected ports.

Any platform specific information?

none

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

dualtor

Documentation

sonic-net/SONiC#1256

What I did: added tests/dualtor/test_multi_mux_nexthop_route.py which
tests use case of multiple nexthop neighbors across different MUX ports.

DEPENDS ON: sonic-net/sonic-swss#2656

Why I did it: test coverage of this scenario

How I did it: test creates route to 2 different interfaces and
neighbors, then validates that traffic is recieved from the expected
ports.
@Ndancejic Ndancejic closed this May 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant