Skip to content

Remove test_tor_ecn from xfail condition mark#6939

Merged
StormLiangMS merged 2 commits intosonic-net:202205from
ZhaohuiS:fix/remove_xfail_ecn_202205
Dec 11, 2022
Merged

Remove test_tor_ecn from xfail condition mark#6939
StormLiangMS merged 2 commits intosonic-net:202205from
ZhaohuiS:fix/remove_xfail_ecn_202205

Conversation

@ZhaohuiS
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ZhaohuiS ZhaohuiS commented Dec 1, 2022

Signed-off-by: Zhaohui Sun [email protected]

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

What is the motivation for this PR?
In #6906, it fixed test_tor_ecn failures.
No need to xfail it.

How did you do it?

Remove test_tor_ecn from xfail condition mark

How did you verify/test it?

Run dualtor/test_tor_ecn.py

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@XuChen-MSFT XuChen-MSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we set "skip" action for non-real dual tor? don't run ecn test for single tor and emulated dual tor.

@ZhaohuiS
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Can we set "skip" action for non-real dual tor? don't run ecn test for single tor and emulated dual tor.

@XuChen-MSFT test_tor_ecn will not run signal tor, since it defines pytest.mark.topology("dualtor") in the beginning of script.

@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS merged commit f2f6a8f into sonic-net:202205 Dec 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants