[POC] Add UT for installer command.#6399
Closed
liuh-80 wants to merge 7 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
“show” command now depends on database, beacuse need check if "gearbox" feature enabled: Add greabox commands only if GEARBOX is configuredif is_gearbox_configured(): |
Contributor
Author
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
Close this PR because shutdown database PR and reload config will break E2E test. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Add new E2E test cases to test sonic-installer not depends on database docker.
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Add new E2E test cases to test sonic-installer not depends on database docker.
How did you do it?
Add new E2E test case to cover user scenarios.
How did you verify/test it?
Run new UT make sure they are all pass.
Make sure all current UT not break during merge validation.
Any platform specific information?
N/A
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?.
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Add E2E test case coverage for SSH login session limit.
How did you do it?
Add new E2E test case to cover user scenarios.
How did you verify/test it?
Run new UT make sure they are all pass.
Make sure all current UT not break during merge validation.
Any platform specific information?
N/A
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?