Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: bingwang <bingwang@microsoft.com>
shi-su
approved these changes
May 24, 2021
Collaborator
Author
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
vmittal-msft
pushed a commit
to vmittal-msft/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2021
Signed-off-by: bingwang <bingwang@microsoft.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
This PR is to fix
test_route_perf.Test case
test_route_perffailed on some platform (Like SN4600) because the added nexthop is a member of PortChannel.orchagentwill crash with following errors.This PR fixes the issue by skipping interfaces that are already in PortChannels.
Signed-off-by: bingwang bingwang@microsoft.com
Type of change
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
This PR is to fix
test_route_perf.How did you do it?
This PR fixes the issue by skipping interfaces that are already in PortChannels.
How did you verify/test it?
Verified on SN4600, both T0 and T1 testbeds. All test case passed.
Any platform specific information?
No.
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
No.
Documentation