Skip to content

[202511] ignore SCD kernel warning about I2C communication ack errors (#21959)#22532

Merged
vmittal-msft merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202511from
lipxu:20260223_public202511_kernelErr
Feb 23, 2026
Merged

[202511] ignore SCD kernel warning about I2C communication ack errors (#21959)#22532
vmittal-msft merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202511from
lipxu:20260223_public202511_kernelErr

Conversation

@lipxu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lipxu lipxu commented Feb 22, 2026

What is the motivation for this PR?
In the new testbed, the kernel outputs warning messages containing the word “error,” which causes LogAnalyzer to treat them as errors.

How did you do it?
It's a warning message, should not be failed in loganalyzer, ignore these messages.

How did you verify/test it?
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71df4bbe3bd7ad16cdf3 https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71dd4b8aa910b618436d https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71dd4b8aa910b618436b https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71dc15026fd4f746b8f0 https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71db4bbe3bd7ad16cdf1 https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71da5e4aaa3c28ac7499

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • 202511

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

…et#21959)

What is the motivation for this PR?
In the new testbed, the kernel outputs warning messages containing the word “error,” which causes LogAnalyzer to treat them as errors.

How did you do it?
It's a warning message, should not be failed in loganalyzer, ignore these messages.

How did you verify/test it?
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71df4bbe3bd7ad16cdf3
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71dd4b8aa910b618436d
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71dd4b8aa910b618436b
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71dc15026fd4f746b8f0
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71db4bbe3bd7ad16cdf1
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/696d71da5e4aaa3c28ac7499

Signed-off-by: xuliping <xuliping@microsoft.com>
@lipxu lipxu force-pushed the 20260223_public202511_kernelErr branch from 4830140 to a620580 Compare February 22, 2026 23:33
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run

@lipxu lipxu marked this pull request as ready for review February 22, 2026 23:34
@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@vmittal-msft vmittal-msft merged commit f52eae5 into sonic-net:202511 Feb 23, 2026
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants