[action] [PR:21513] fix: fix arp_update complains missing interface entry for static route#22056
Merged
vmittal-msft merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202511from Feb 9, 2026
Merged
Conversation
sonic-net#21513) Fix E 2025 Nov 26 22:08:52.060655 ERR swss2#arp_update[16275]: 178 missing interface entry for static route 20.1.1.1 What is the motivation for this PR? For tear down, we need to remove the route first before the arp. Otherwise swss will throw error How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? MS Only: https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/692f7c4c8a84f286cc565304 Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <[email protected]>
12 tasks
Collaborator
Author
|
Original PR: #21513 |
Collaborator
Author
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
github-actions
bot
requested review from
developfast,
rraghav-cisco and
sdszhang
rraghav-cisco
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2026
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
sonic-net#18799) * Added skip to vxlan decap test due to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22056 * Update tests_mark_conditions.yaml Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
ytzur1
pushed a commit
to ytzur1/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2026
sonic-net#18799) * Added skip to vxlan decap test due to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22056 * Update tests_mark_conditions.yaml Signed-off-by: Yael Tzur <[email protected]>
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-mgmt |
Collaborator
Author
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-mgmt |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-mgmt |
Collaborator
Author
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-mgmt |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
vmittal-msft
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2026
lakshmi-nexthop
pushed a commit
to lakshmi-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2026
sonic-net#21513) (sonic-net#22056) Fix E 2025 Nov 26 22:08:52.060655 ERR swss2#arp_update[16275]: 178 missing interface entry for static route 20.1.1.1 What is the motivation for this PR? For tear down, we need to remove the route first before the arp. Otherwise swss will throw error How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? MS Only: https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/692f7c4c8a84f286cc565304 Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Austin (Thang Pham) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Yarramaneni <[email protected]>
AkeelAli
pushed a commit
to AkeelAli/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2026
sonic-net#18799) * Added skip to vxlan decap test due to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22056 * Update tests_mark_conditions.yaml
fraserg-arista
pushed a commit
to fraserg-arista/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2026
…image sonic-net#22056 (sonic-net#542) <!-- Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines; https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier: --> ### Description of PR <!-- - Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. - Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context? - List any dependencies that are required for this change. --> Summary: Added skip to vxlan decap test due to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22056 on t0-isolated topologies ### Type of change <!-- - Fill x for your type of change. - e.g. - [x] Bug fix --> - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) - [ ] New Test case - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms - [ ] Test case improvement ### Back port request - [ ] 202205 - [ ] 202305 - [ ] 202311 - [ ] 202405 - [x] 202411 - [x] 202505 ### Approach #### What is the motivation for this PR? Skip vxlan decap test due to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22056 #### How did you do it? #### How did you verify/test it? #### Any platform specific information? #### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? ### Documentation <!-- (If it's a new feature, new test case) Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation? Link to the wiki page? -->
RishiRewadkarCisco
pushed a commit
to RishiRewadkarCisco/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2026
sonic-net#18799) * Added skip to vxlan decap test due to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22056 * Update tests_mark_conditions.yaml
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
sonic-net#18799) * Added skip to vxlan decap test due to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22056 * Update tests_mark_conditions.yaml
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary: Fix missing interface entry
Fixes # (issue) 36037511
Fix
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
For tear down, we need to remove the route first before the arp. Otherwise swss will throw error
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
MS Only: https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/692f7c4c8a84f286cc565304
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation