Ignore router advertisements in PTF#20113
Merged
wangxin merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom Aug 8, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
wangxin
approved these changes
Aug 8, 2025
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2025
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202505: #20165 |
11 tasks
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2025
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
ashutosh-agrawal
pushed a commit
to ashutosh-agrawal/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2025
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
vidyac86
pushed a commit
to vidyac86/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2025
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
AharonMalkin
pushed a commit
to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <amalkin@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2026
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
ytzur1
pushed a commit
to ytzur1/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2026
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Yael Tzur <ytzur@nvidia.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking. Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Ignore any router advertisements sent by a DUT, and don't set a default route or an address based on it. This could happen if a T0 testbed with radv running sends router advertisements on a VLAN interface, which may result in the PTF container adding a default route on all of the VLAN interfaces. This could result in some IPv6 test cases breaking.
How did you do it?
Set the
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_rasysctl to 0 when creating the PTF container. All of the interfaces that get created/moved into the PTF container then inherit this setting.How did you verify/test it?
Ran add-topo for vms-kvm-t0, and verified that the router advertisements sent by the T0 didn't result in a default route being learned.
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation