[master][sonic-mgmt]Skip everflow/test_everflow_ipv6 and ipv6 cases under everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3#19308
Merged
StormLiangMS merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom Jul 4, 2025
Conversation
under everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-DCS7260CX3
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
pragnya-arista
changed the title
Collaborator
|
hi @prsunny could you help to comment if we can skip this one on 7260? |
prsunny
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2025
Contributor
|
@mramezani95 , could you review as well? |
Contributor
|
@pragnya-arista Can you please also skip these tests? These tests have also failed in our nightly tests for the same reason: |
Collaborator
hi @pragnya-arista, could you help to take a look? |
Contributor
Author
Sure, will do - since the PR has already merged to master, I'll open a separate PR for skipping v6 cases under test_everflow_per_interface.py for master(and backport that to 202505) |
Contributor
Author
Sure, will file a separate PR for this since the current PR has already merged |
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2)
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202505: #19437 |
11 tasks
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2)
mssonicbld
added
Included in 202505 branch
and removed
Created PR to 202505 branch
labels
11 tasks
Contributor
Author
Filed 19500 for skipping these cases |
11 tasks
11 tasks
nissampa
pushed a commit
to nissampa/sonic-mgmt_dpu_test
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2)
ashutosh-agrawal
pushed a commit
to ashutosh-agrawal/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2)
vidyac86
pushed a commit
to vidyac86/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2)
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2) Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <110003254+opcoder0@users.noreply.github.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2) Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
AharonMalkin
pushed a commit
to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2) Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <amalkin@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2) Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2026
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2)
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2) Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
ytzur1
pushed a commit
to ytzur1/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2026
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2) Signed-off-by: Yael Tzur <ytzur@nvidia.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
…nder everflow/test_everflow_testbed on Arista-7260CX3 (sonic-net#19308) What is the motivation for this PR? Support for everflow over ipv6 encap cases was added by PR 16836 However, this does not appear to have SAI support on 7260CX3 When a mirror session for everflow over v6 becomes active on 7260CX3, the orchagent crashes |E|SAI_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED is seen in sairedis.rec This is being tracked in 627 and public issue 19096 The DUT will never forward the test traffic encapsulated over IPv6+GRE/ERSPAN to the collector since it's unsupported How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology Any platform specific information? Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (627)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Tested with Arista-7260CX3-D108C8 DUT in a dt120 topology
Any platform specific information?
Yes - Arista-7260CX3(TH2)
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation