Add new Arista SKU to port_utils#18487
Merged
StormLiangMS merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom Jun 12, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
sdszhang
reviewed
Jun 5, 2025
| elif hwsku in ["Arista-7060X6-64DE-O128S2", "Arista-7060X6-64PE-O128S2", "Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2"]: | ||
| for i in range(1, 65): | ||
| for j in [1, 5]: | ||
| port_alias_to_name_map["Ethernet%d/%d" % (i, j)] = "Ethernet%d" % ((i - 1) * 8 + j - 1) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I believe the name has changed to etpx name. can you update it here?
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
dayouliu1
force-pushed
the
add-port-utils
branch
from
464759d to
a926a70
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
dayouliu1
force-pushed
the
add-port-utils
branch
from
a926a70 to
1abac36
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
hi @dayouliu1 could you file separate PR to 202412 branch? |
Collaborator
|
@dayouliu1 PR conflicts with 202505 branch |
r12f
reviewed
Jun 15, 2025
| for j, split_alias in enumerate(split_alias_list): | ||
| alias = "etp{}{}".format(i, split_alias) | ||
| port_alias_to_name_map[alias] = "Ethernet%d" % ((i - 1) * 8 + j * 4) | ||
| port_alias_to_name_map["etp65"] = "Ethernet512" |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hi @dayouliu1 , the O128 doesn't have port Ethernet512 and Ethernet513, so this would fail the O128 HWSKU.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can remove Ethernet512, Ethernet513 and backport the changes to 202412
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed unneeded ports (for O128 skus): #19094
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Manual cherrypick: Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#419
Collaborator
|
Picked to 202412: Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#419 |
r12f
added
Approved for msft-202412 Branch
Included in msft-202412 Branch
and removed
Cherry Pick Conflict_msft-202412
labels
Collaborator
|
hi @dayouliu1 could you check the 202505 conflict? |
Contributor
Author
Has been done here: #19228 |
yejianquan
added
Included in 202505 branch
and removed
Cherry Pick Conflict_202505
labels
nissampa
pushed a commit
to nissampa/sonic-mgmt_dpu_test
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2025
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <110003254+opcoder0@users.noreply.github.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
AharonMalkin
pushed a commit
to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <amalkin@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2026
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
ytzur1
pushed a commit
to ytzur1/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2026
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils Signed-off-by: Yael Tzur <ytzur@nvidia.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
…nic-net#18487) What is the motivation for this PR? Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Add Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128S2 to port_utils
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation