disable pfcwd for lossy platforms in deploy-mg#18350
disable pfcwd for lossy platforms in deploy-mg#18350StormLiangMS merged 5 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
StormLiangMS
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hi @sdszhang just small question, should we use HWSKU + topo to define lossy HW? I would think same HWSKU could use for lossless scenario also, so this assumption maybe not true in that case?
these hwsku don't have lossless buffer defined in the /usr/share/sonic/device/<platform>/<hwsku> directory. so they cannot be used for lossless scenario. Currently, we don't have the scenario of using both lossless and lossy topo on same HWSKU, so should be fine. We can leave it for the future when the requirement comes in. |
|
manual cherry-pick PR to msft-202412: Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#271 |
|
Cherry-pick PR to msft-202412: |
What is the motivation for this PR? Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform How did you do it? Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform How did you verify/test it? Verified on physical platform. Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <[email protected]>
What is the motivation for this PR? Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform How did you do it? Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform How did you verify/test it? Verified on physical platform. Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <[email protected]>
What is the motivation for this PR? Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform How did you do it? Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform How did you verify/test it? Verified on physical platform. Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
What is the motivation for this PR? Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform How did you do it? Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform How did you verify/test it? Verified on physical platform. Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
Description of PR
Summary:
Update default_pfcwd_status to disable for some platform which only have lossy traffic.
Note: This PR needs the image fix sonic-net/sonic-utilities#3880 for it to work.
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform
How did you do it?
Update the default pfcwd status in golden_config for lossy platform
How did you verify/test it?
Verified on physical platform.
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation