Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the PR. I would suggest separating the change into 2 different PRs
|
auspham
force-pushed
the
austinpham/32099755-LT2-definition
branch
from
948a2e9 to
ab64798
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
auspham
force-pushed
the
austinpham/32099755-LT2-definition
branch
from
ab64798 to
4f947cb
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
Retriggered PR test |
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
bingwang-ms
previously approved these changes
May 1, 2025
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com>
auspham
force-pushed
the
austinpham/32099755-LT2-definition
branch
from
a530047 to
30787fb
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
/azpw run |
Collaborator
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
@bingwang-ms can we merge this? |
bingwang-ms
approved these changes
May 12, 2025
r12f
pushed a commit
to Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2025
…#18159 (#326) Cherry-pick generate_topo.py changes in sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#18159 only into 202412 to avoid conflict. Removed LT2 part of change as it's not needed in 202412. > ### Description of PR > Summary: Adding LT2 topology and support for generate_topo. We needed to modify the PortChannel name to only use `PortChannel10` for multi-asic only to avoid the interface name more than 15 characters which will violate linux interface name. > > Fixes # (issue) 32099755 > > ### Type of change > * [ ] Bug fix > * [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) > * [ ] New Test case > > * [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms > * [ ] Test case improvement > > ### Back port request > * [ ] 202012 > * [ ] 202205 > * [ ] 202305 > * [ ] 202311 > * [ ] 202405 > * [ ] 202411 > > ### Approach > #### What is the motivation for this PR? > Add LT2 minigraph changes and topology > > #### How did you do it? > #### How did you verify/test it? > #### Any platform specific information? > #### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? > ### Documentation
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com>
AharonMalkin
pushed a commit
to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <amalkin@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary: Adding LT2 topology and support for generate_topo. We needed to modify the PortChannel name to only use
PortChannel10for multi-asic only to avoid the interface name more than 15 characters which will violate linux interface name.Fixes # (issue) 32099755
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Add LT2 minigraph changes and topology
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation