[action] [PR:17767] Restore config after vxlan_crm from vxlan_ecmp.#18034
Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202411from Apr 18, 2025
Merged
[action] [PR:17767] Restore config after vxlan_crm from vxlan_ecmp.#18034mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202411from
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202411from
Conversation
What is the motivation for this PR? test_vxlan_crm.py was recently enabled for smartswitch, which uses the same setup fixture as test_vxlan_ecmp.py. However, the tests in test_vxlan_ecmp.py have additional cleanup code to handle these BFD entries which is missing in test_vxlan_crm.py. How did you do it? Added a config restore fixture, same as in sonic-net#17046, to test_vxlan_ecmp.py which is re-used by test_vxlan_crm.py How did you verify/test it? Ran test_cacl_application.py after running test_vxlan_crm.py and it's now passing with the fix in place. Also checked that iptable is cleaned up after running test_vxlan_crm.py.
11 tasks
Collaborator
Author
|
Original PR: #17767 |
Collaborator
Author
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
test_cacl_application.py was failing on smartswitch due to BFD iptable rules not being cleaned up by test_vxlan_crm.py, similarly to #17046 .
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
test_vxlan_crm.py was recently enabled for smartswitch, which uses the same setup fixture as test_vxlan_ecmp.py. However, the tests in test_vxlan_ecmp.py have additional cleanup code to handle these BFD entries which is missing in test_vxlan_crm.py.
How did you do it?
Added a config restore fixture, same as in #17046, to test_vxlan_ecmp.py which is re-used by test_vxlan_crm.py
How did you verify/test it?
Ran test_cacl_application.py after running test_vxlan_crm.py and it's now passing with the fix in place. Also checked that iptable is cleaned up after running test_vxlan_crm.py.
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation