Skip to content

Added new hwskus Mellanox-SN5640-C512S2 Mellanox-SN5640-C448O16#17785

Closed
SavchukRomanLv wants to merge 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
SavchukRomanLv:intruduce_scp5_hwskus
Closed

Added new hwskus Mellanox-SN5640-C512S2 Mellanox-SN5640-C448O16#17785
SavchukRomanLv wants to merge 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
SavchukRomanLv:intruduce_scp5_hwskus

Conversation

@SavchukRomanLv
Copy link

Description of PR

Summary:
Added 2 new hwskus for Nvidia platforms

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

Introduce new NVIDIA platforms

How did you do it?

Added data to sonic-mgmt framework

How did you verify/test it?

Run regression with new HWSKUs

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@SavchukRomanLv SavchukRomanLv force-pushed the intruduce_scp5_hwskus branch from 1cd5184 to 2f422b0 Compare April 1, 2025 06:44
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

liat-grozovik
liat-grozovik previously approved these changes May 28, 2025
@liat-grozovik
Copy link
Collaborator

@AharonMalkin need to resolve conflict and then i can also merge the other PR depends on this one

@AharonMalkin
Copy link
Contributor

@liat-grozovik conflicts resolved

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

'Mellanox-SN5610N-C256S2', 'Mellanox-SN5610N-C224O8']
mellanox_spc5_hwskus: [ 'Mellanox-SN5640-C512S2', 'Mellanox-SN5640-C448O16']
mellanox_hwskus: "{{ mellanox_spc1_hwskus + mellanox_spc2_hwskus + mellanox_spc3_hwskus + mellanox_spc4_hwskus + mellanox_spc5_hwskus + mellanox_spc5_hwskus }}"
mellanox_spc5_hwskus: [ Mellanox-SN5640-C512S2', 'Mellanox-SN5640-C448O16']
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like there is a missing leading '.

Will go with this PR: #18921

@liat-grozovik
Copy link
Collaborator

@AharonMalkin please review the other PR mentioned. If it is good please approve it. and then we can close this one

@AharonMalkin
Copy link
Contributor

Other PR approved, will close this one

mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt.msft that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2025
<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Introduced x86_64-nvidia_sn5640-r0 for platform tests
Must be merged after sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#17785

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
    - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
Add new platform to be covered in sonic-mgmt
#### How did you do it?
Add appropriate data in sensors, psus, qos test data and test cases
#### How did you verify/test it?
Run sensors, psu, qos tests cases
#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
mssonicbld added a commit to Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2025
…ests (#463)

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Introduced x86_64-nvidia_sn5640-r0 for platform tests
Must be merged after sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#17785

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
 - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
Add new platform to be covered in sonic-mgmt
#### How did you do it?
Add appropriate data in sensors, psus, qos test data and test cases
#### How did you verify/test it?
Run sensors, psu, qos tests cases
#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants