Skip to content

Loganalyzer fix for cisco platform Cisco-8102-28FH-DPU-O-T1#17263

Merged
bingwang-ms merged 4 commits intosonic-net:202405from
nnelluri-cisco:loganalyzer-fix
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

Loganalyzer fix for cisco platform Cisco-8102-28FH-DPU-O-T1#17263
bingwang-ms merged 4 commits intosonic-net:202405from
nnelluri-cisco:loganalyzer-fix

Conversation

@nnelluri-cisco
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nnelluri-cisco nnelluri-cisco commented Feb 28, 2025

Description of PR

Loganalyzer fix for cisco platform Cisco-8102-28FH-DPU-O-T1
Summary:Loganalyzer fix for cisco platform Cisco-8102-28FH-DPU-O-T1
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • [ X] Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411

Approach

added fix to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file.

What is the motivation for this PR?

202405 branch few tests were failing due to syslog error.

How did you do it?

added below changes to to the file
+++ b/ansible/roles/test/files/tools/loganalyzer/loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt
Fix:
+r, ".* ERR pmon#xcvrd:.CMIS:.no suitable app for the port appl."
+r, ".
ERR kernel:.*ltc2497.*i2c transfer failed: -EFAULT"

How did you verify/test it?

ran below test cases:
drop_packets/test_drop_counters.py
iface_namingmode/test_iface_namingmode.py::TestConfigInterface::test_config_interface_speed

Any platform specific information?

Cisco-8102-28FH-DPU-O-T1

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

t1-28-lag

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@nnelluri-cisco
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@prabhataravind

Please review and approve , This fix will resolve below two failures.
2025 Feb 17 02:00:29.903491 MtFuji-dut ERR kernel: [22022.994275] ltc2497 25-0014: i2c transfer failed: -EFAULT
2025 Feb 17 04:47:27.628400 MtFuji-dut ERR pmon#xcvrd: CMIS: Ethernet104: no suitable app for the port appl 1 host_lane_count 8 host_speed 200000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@prabhataravind prabhataravind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@bingwang-ms bingwang-ms merged commit 766d80e into sonic-net:202405 Mar 4, 2025
13 checks passed
@prabhataravind
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nnelluri-cisco do we need this in 202411 and master?

@nnelluri-cisco
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yes @prabhataravind
requested backupport to 202411.

@prabhataravind
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes @prabhataravind requested backupport to 202411.

@nnelluri-cisco, could you create a PR for master and then we can add request labels to 202411 and 202505?

@yejianquan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

feature branch can't take request label, will be handled in #19877

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants