[default-route-bgp-flap]: [T2] Fix and handle AZNG route-map for upstream LC#16532
Merged
arlakshm merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom Apr 18, 2025
Merged
[default-route-bgp-flap]: [T2] Fix and handle AZNG route-map for upstream LC#16532arlakshm merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
arlakshm merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
tjchadaga
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2025
arlakshm
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2025
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to msft-202503: Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#212 |
mssonicbld
added
Included in msft-202503 Branch
and removed
Created PR to msft-202503 Branch
labels
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'test_default_route_with_bgp_flap', for msft specific AZNG route maps on upstream LC fails even with the fix provided by [default-route-bgp-flap]: Fix for 9052 - test failure sonic-net#15962 How did you do it? In addition to the fix provided by [default-route-bgp-flap]: Fix for 9052 - test failure sonic-net#15962 , handle the case for all route maps. How did you verify/test it? Ran the test on T2 chassis with upstream LC, having different sets of route maps and made sure the tests are passing as expected. Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <[email protected]>
AharonMalkin
pushed a commit
to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'test_default_route_with_bgp_flap', for msft specific AZNG route maps on upstream LC fails even with the fix provided by [default-route-bgp-flap]: Fix for 9052 - test failure sonic-net#15962 How did you do it? In addition to the fix provided by [default-route-bgp-flap]: Fix for 9052 - test failure sonic-net#15962 , handle the case for all route maps. How did you verify/test it? Ran the test on T2 chassis with upstream LC, having different sets of route maps and made sure the tests are passing as expected. Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <[email protected]>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'test_default_route_with_bgp_flap', for msft specific AZNG route maps on upstream LC fails even with the fix provided by [default-route-bgp-flap]: Fix for 9052 - test failure sonic-net#15962 How did you do it? In addition to the fix provided by [default-route-bgp-flap]: Fix for 9052 - test failure sonic-net#15962 , handle the case for all route maps. How did you verify/test it? Ran the test on T2 chassis with upstream LC, having different sets of route maps and made sure the tests are passing as expected. Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
What is the motivation for this PR? 'test_default_route_with_bgp_flap', for msft specific AZNG route maps on upstream LC fails even with the fix provided by [default-route-bgp-flap]: Fix for 9052 - test failure sonic-net#15962 How did you do it? In addition to the fix provided by [default-route-bgp-flap]: Fix for 9052 - test failure sonic-net#15962 , handle the case for all route maps. How did you verify/test it? Ran the test on T2 chassis with upstream LC, having different sets of route maps and made sure the tests are passing as expected. Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
11 tasks
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to msft-202412: Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#1063 |
mssonicbld
added
Included in msft-202412 Branch
and removed
Created PR to msft-202412 Branch
labels
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
In addition to the fix provided by #15962 for the issue #9052, this code change is also needed for handling AZNG route map changes on upstream LC.
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation