Skip to content

Fix subnet_decap test condition error#16161

Merged
wangxin merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202411from
xwjiang-ms:fix_202411_subnet_decap
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Fix subnet_decap test condition error#16161
wangxin merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202411from
xwjiang-ms:fix_202411_subnet_decap

Conversation

@xwjiang-ms
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@xwjiang-ms xwjiang-ms commented Dec 19, 2024

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

In PR #16152, we need to skip subnet decap test in PR test if issue not resolved, but conditions should be or, not and

How did you do it?

Set conditions_logical_operator to or

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines could not run because the pipeline triggers exclude this branch/path.

@wangxin wangxin merged commit 3c088bc into sonic-net:202411 Dec 19, 2024
@xwjiang-ms xwjiang-ms deleted the fix_202411_subnet_decap branch December 19, 2024 08:32
congh-nvidia added a commit to congh-nvidia/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 8, 2025
Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.
congh-nvidia added a commit to congh-nvidia/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.
bingwang-ms pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
Issue #16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue #8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.
mssonicbld pushed a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 27, 2025
…#18276)

Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.
mssonicbld pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2025
Issue #16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue #8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.
congh-nvidia added a commit to congh-nvidia/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
congh-nvidia added a commit to congh-nvidia/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
bingwang-ms pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2025
opcoder0 pushed a commit to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
…#18276)

Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.

Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <[email protected]>
AharonMalkin pushed a commit to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2025
…#18276)

Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.

Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <[email protected]>
gshemesh2 pushed a commit to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2025
…#18276)

Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.

Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
gshemesh2 pushed a commit to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2026
…#18276)

Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed.
And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active.
Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.

Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants