xfail pfcwd test_pfcwd_warm_reboot case for Arista and Mellanox#15943
Closed
lipxu wants to merge 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
Closed
xfail pfcwd test_pfcwd_warm_reboot case for Arista and Mellanox#15943lipxu wants to merge 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
lipxu wants to merge 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
lipxu
changed the title
Collaborator
|
Probably we can do this change internally if community has other mechanism to workaround the limitation. |
Contributor
Author
Good point, thanks for your suggestion @bingwang-ms , I will create an internal PR to xfail this case during internal run, thanks |
Contributor
Author
|
Xfail the case in internal branch. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
29870655
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
the case is flaky
How did you do it?
XFAIL the case until the testbed environment limitations are fixed
How did you verify/test it?
Run locally
Any platform specific information?
Broadcom
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation