Skip to content

fix: fix flaky pfc_storm#15544

Merged
yejianquan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
auspham:austinpham/30115860-fix-flaky-storm-restore-pfcwd-function
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

fix: fix flaky pfc_storm#15544
yejianquan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
auspham:austinpham/30115860-fix-flaky-storm-restore-pfcwd-function

Conversation

@auspham
Copy link
Contributor

@auspham auspham commented Nov 13, 2024

Description of PR

Summary: Fix flaky pfc_storm stom_restored
Fixes # (issue) 30115860

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

Currently we detect flaky in detecting storm restore. The reason was because the storm terminated early and restore itself before LogAnalyzer can detect restoration.

As a result, we want to keep this to be stormed long enough.

After the end of each test case, we have stop_storm so it would be fine.

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@sdszhang sdszhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@yejianquan yejianquan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@yejianquan yejianquan merged commit 5152003 into sonic-net:master Nov 14, 2024
mssonicbld pushed a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
Description of PR
Summary: Fix flaky pfc_storm stom_restored
Fixes # (issue) 30115860

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Currently we detect flaky in detecting storm restore. The reason was because the storm terminated early and restore itself before LogAnalyzer can detect restoration.

As a result, we want to keep this to be stormed long enough.

After the end of each test case, we have stop_storm so it would be fine.

Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <[email protected]>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry-pick PR to 202405: #15552

mssonicbld pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Description of PR
Summary: Fix flaky pfc_storm stom_restored
Fixes # (issue) 30115860

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Currently we detect flaky in detecting storm restore. The reason was because the storm terminated early and restore itself before LogAnalyzer can detect restoration.

As a result, we want to keep this to be stormed long enough.

After the end of each test case, we have stop_storm so it would be fine.

Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <[email protected]>
sreejithsreekumaran pushed a commit to sreejithsreekumaran/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Description of PR
Summary: Fix flaky pfc_storm stom_restored
Fixes # (issue) 30115860

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Currently we detect flaky in detecting storm restore. The reason was because the storm terminated early and restore itself before LogAnalyzer can detect restoration.

As a result, we want to keep this to be stormed long enough.

After the end of each test case, we have stop_storm so it would be fine.

Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <[email protected]>
yutongzhang-microsoft pushed a commit to yutongzhang-microsoft/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Description of PR
Summary: Fix flaky pfc_storm stom_restored
Fixes # (issue) 30115860

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Currently we detect flaky in detecting storm restore. The reason was because the storm terminated early and restore itself before LogAnalyzer can detect restoration.

As a result, we want to keep this to be stormed long enough.

After the end of each test case, we have stop_storm so it would be fine.

Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants