[PR:12825] 202305 fix fixture order issue in ipv6_mgmt tacacs and telemetry cases#12845
Merged
yejianquan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202305from May 15, 2024
Merged
Conversation
…y cases (sonic-net#12825) Description of PR This PR is to address the fixture setup sequence issue, and teardown out of sequence issue. In convert_and_restore_config_db_to_ipv6_only, it will do a "config reload -y" during fixture setup or teardown. For feature test cases where config is not saved into config_db.json, this reload needs to be done before feature fixture setup and after feature teardown, such as: tacacs_v6, setup_streaming_telemetry, or setup_ntp. According to https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/reference/fixtures.html#reference-fixtures, it only considers the following when deciding the fixture orders: scope dependencies autouse We shouldn't use autouse in this test module. So only two options to let convert_and_restore_config_db_to_ipv6_only runs before other fixtures: define other fixtures in 'function' scope. define the feature fixture to request convert_and_restore_config_db_to_ipv6_only explicit. Using option sonic-net#1 in this PR as the new 'function' scope fixture can be reused by other cases. Option sonic-net#2 has good readability, but will limit the new fixture to be used by ipv6_only cases. Summary: Fixes sonic-net#12705 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Multiple errors were observed in mgmt_ipv6 are related to fixture setup/teardown sequence. How did you do it? Added two 'function' scope fixture: check_tacacs_v6_func and setup_streaming_telemetry_func. And modified 3 tests cases to use 'function' scope fixture. test_ro_user_ipv6_only test_rw_user_ipv6_only test_telemetry_output_ipv6_only co-authorized by: [email protected]
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick (#12825) into 202305 branch.
Description of PR
This PR is to address the fixture setup sequence issue, and teardown out of sequence issue.
In convert_and_restore_config_db_to_ipv6_only, it will do a "config reload -y" during fixture setup or teardown.
For feature test cases where config is not saved into config_db.json, this reload needs to be done before feature fixture setup and after feature teardown, such as: tacacs_v6, setup_streaming_telemetry, or setup_ntp.
According to https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/reference/fixtures.html#reference-fixtures, it only considers the following when deciding the fixture orders:
We shouldn't use autouse in this test module. So only two options to let convert_and_restore_config_db_to_ipv6_only runs before other fixtures:
Using option #1 in this PR as the new 'function' scope fixture can be reused by other cases. Option #2 has good readability, but will limit the new fixture to be used by ipv6_only cases.
Summary:
Fixes #12705
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Multiple errors were observed in mgmt_ipv6 are related to fixture setup/teardown sequence.
How did you do it?
Added two 'function' scope fixture: check_tacacs_v6_func and setup_streaming_telemetry_func.
And modified 3 tests cases to use 'function' scope fixture.
How did you verify/test it?
Run it on kvm testbed, all passed.
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation