-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Full Mesh Traffic Sanity verification #11968
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
kevinskwang
merged 9 commits into
sonic-net:master
from
sreejithsreekumaran:full_mesh_traffic_sanity
Jun 14, 2024
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dd76c1d
Added testcase to run traffic in full mesh
sreejithsreekumaran 155b2e0
Removed the unwanted Try block
sreejithsreekumaran d477e2c
Made adding static routes a pytest fixture
sreejithsreekumaran b53bf93
Added fixture to configure ip on ptf interfaces while using PTF64 topo
sreejithsreekumaran 1c46670
Merge upstream after sync
sreejithsreekumaran 2bf2987
Changed to skip for all platforms except Cisco
sreejithsreekumaran 21b9a44
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into full_mesh_traffic…
sreejithsreekumaran e45042d
flake8 issues reported from changes in PR 9896
sreejithsreekumaran 4832ead
Merge master
sreejithsreekumaran File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From your code here, the case should be skipped if asic type is cisco-8000, how you get the test result you posted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kevinskwang the case will be skipped only if it's not a ptf64 topology and asic-type is cisco-8000. The test result is posted from a testbed having ptf64 topology and asic_type is cisco-8000
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can this case to be used by other platforms?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes it can be used by other platforms as long as it is from Cisco.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I mean other platform, like broadcom. mellanox
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok. I got it now. Yes, it's written currently for Cisco platform only.
I have fixed the condition to skip for other platforms too.