Skip to content

[action] [PR:9625] [Mellanox][Dual-Tor][DSCP remapping]Fix a test issue for the dualtor tunnel monitor for Nvidia platforms#11299

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202311from
mssonicbld:cherry/202311/9625
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

[action] [PR:9625] [Mellanox][Dual-Tor][DSCP remapping]Fix a test issue for the dualtor tunnel monitor for Nvidia platforms#11299
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202311from
mssonicbld:cherry/202311/9625

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (#9624)
On Nvidia platforms, when the inner/outer DSCPs are 2/2 or 6/6, the tunnel packet is not mapped based on the mapping configuration to queue 1 (they will be mapped to queue 2 and 6).
And we have confirmed with MSFT that such packets are not expected in production.
So, skip the queue check for them.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

Fix test issue (#9624)

How did you do it?

Skip the queue check in tunnel monitor on Nvidia platforms when dscp is 2/2 or 6/6

How did you verify/test it?

Run test on 4600C dualtor setup, passed.

Any platform specific information?

Only for Nvidia platforms.

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

…onic-net#9625)

When the inner/outer dscps are 2/2 or 6/6, the packet is not mapped to queue according to the mapping configuration. And such packets are not expected in production, skip the queue check for them.

Change-Id: I8f02d086d2f9eb010684e1ac41cf1abfe6ca2788
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #9625

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit d5b55eb into sonic-net:202311 Jan 22, 2024
@mssonicbld mssonicbld deleted the cherry/202311/9625 branch February 4, 2024 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants