[sflow + dropmon] added missing patch for the sFlow + dropmon feature.#281
Conversation
|
@saiarcot895 could you please review it? |
paulmenzel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please reword the merge/pull request summary and description (describing the problem, the fix, and the tests.), and also update the commit message.
| From 7dbf2689eb841c51dca4dad51b0941c06aa09e26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | ||
| From: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> | ||
| Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:41:46 +0000 | ||
| Subject: [PATCH 3/3] psample: added define PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR, used in SDK driver sx_psample.c |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe describe the feature instead of the diff.
| From: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> | ||
| Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:41:46 +0000 | ||
| Subject: [PATCH 3/3] psample: added define PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR, used in SDK driver sx_psample.c | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add a elaborate commit message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe: Define the macro PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR …
But a very minor nit.
|
I see that the buildimage PR depends on this. Since the other PR is already merged, does it break buildimage? |
Yes, it brakes the buildimage |
…ample driver Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]>
1f3e4cc to
f03f5fa
Compare
paulmenzel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please also update the merge/pull request summary/title.
| From: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> | ||
| Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:41:46 +0000 | ||
| Subject: [PATCH 3/3] psample: added define PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR, used in SDK driver sx_psample.c | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe: Define the macro PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR …
But a very minor nit.
Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]>
Done |
Update sonic-linux-kernel submodule pointer to include the following: * [Mellanox] Add new kernel patches from HW-MGMT package V.7.0020.3005 ([sonic-net#287](sonic-net/sonic-linux-kernel#287)) * [patch] mlxsw: i2c: Prevent transaction execution for special chip ([sonic-net#279](sonic-net/sonic-linux-kernel#279)) * [sflow + dropmon] added missing patch for the sFlow + dropmon feature. ([sonic-net#281](sonic-net/sonic-linux-kernel#281)) * [sflow + dropmon] added patches for the sFlow + dropmon feature. ([sonic-net#276](sonic-net/sonic-linux-kernel#276)) Signed-off-by: dprital <[email protected]>
sonic-net#281) * [sflow + dropmon] Add patch which add Nvivia-specific flag for the psample driver Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> * Correct patch name Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> This defines the macro PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR
sonic-net#281) * [sflow + dropmon] Add patch which add Nvivia-specific flag for the psample driver Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> * Correct patch name Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> This defines the macro PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR
sonic-net#281) * [sflow + dropmon] Add patch which add Nvivia-specific flag for the psample driver Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> * Correct patch name Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> This defines the macro PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR
#281) * [sflow + dropmon] Add patch which add Nvivia-specific flag for the psample driver Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> * Correct patch name Signed-off-by: Vadym Hlushko <[email protected]> This defines the macro PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR
…sonic-net#281) What I did Fix ProcessStatsST column issue Why I did it sonic-net/sonic-host-services#176, when did optimization of the state_db update into batch as dict, not realized "%" is missed, which is a regression issue.  How I verified it Correct typo and added corresponding unit test to cover column name check.
Added a patch with changes required for the
sFlow + dropmonfeature.#define PSAMPLE_MD_EXTENDED_ATTR 1should be declared in thesonic-linux-kernelrepo but used in Switch-SDK-drivers/drivers/net/sx_netdev/sx_psample.cSigned-off-by: Vadym Hlushko [email protected]