Skip to content

[action] [PR:23500] [frr]: update next hop group support by metadata value with disabled as the default value#25088

Closed
mssonicbld wants to merge 14 commits intosonic-net:202511from
mssonicbld:cherry/202511/23500
Closed

[action] [PR:23500] [frr]: update next hop group support by metadata value with disabled as the default value#25088
mssonicbld wants to merge 14 commits intosonic-net:202511from
mssonicbld:cherry/202511/23500

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

update next hop group support by metadata value with disabled as the default value

Why I did it

Netscan loss observed on production devices

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):
    33406776

How I did it

update next hop group support by metadata value with disabled as the default value

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…as the default value

update next hop group support by metadata value with disabled as the default value

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it
Netscan loss observed on production devices

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:
33406776

#### How I did it
update next hop group support by metadata value with disabled as the default value

#### How to verify it

<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [ ] 202505

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #23500

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@radha-danda
Copy link

radha-danda commented Jan 16, 2026

@lipxu, can you please check the PR for yang errors?

@vmittal-msft - FYI

@lipxu
Copy link
Contributor

lipxu commented Jan 17, 2026

@lipxu, can you please check the PR for yang errors?

@vmittal-msft - FYI

Hi, @radha-danda , I think the commit is in 202511, no need no PR, please double check, thanks

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@vmittal-msft
Copy link
Contributor

@lipxu please check if the fix is there in 202511. if so, please close.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@radha-danda
Copy link

@lipxu, @vmittal-msft, Changes are present in 202511 branch. PR can be closed

@lipxu lipxu closed this Feb 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants