[Mellanox] Fix platform name while checking platform EEPROM#24634
Merged
liat-grozovik merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom Dec 15, 2025
Merged
[Mellanox] Fix platform name while checking platform EEPROM#24634liat-grozovik merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
liat-grozovik merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
keboliu
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2025
liat-grozovik
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2025
hdwhdw
pushed a commit
to hdwhdw/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
…t#24634) - Why I did it Fix platform name in eeprom.py to support getting system eeprom on 5640 simx platform - How I did it Use correct platform name "x86_64-nvidia_sn5640_simx-r0" - How to verify it Manual test Signed-off-by: Dawei Huang <daweihuang@microsoft.com>
xwjiang-ms
pushed a commit
to xwjiang-ms/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2025
…t#24634) - Why I did it Fix platform name in eeprom.py to support getting system eeprom on 5640 simx platform - How I did it Use correct platform name "x86_64-nvidia_sn5640_simx-r0" - How to verify it Manual test Signed-off-by: xiaweijiang <xiaweijiang@microsoft.com>
9 tasks
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202511: #25095 |
jasonbridges
pushed a commit
to jasonbridges/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2026
…t#24634) - Why I did it Fix platform name in eeprom.py to support getting system eeprom on 5640 simx platform - How I did it Use correct platform name "x86_64-nvidia_sn5640_simx-r0" - How to verify it Manual test
FengPan-Frank
pushed a commit
to FengPan-Frank/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2026
…t#24634) - Why I did it Fix platform name in eeprom.py to support getting system eeprom on 5640 simx platform - How I did it Use correct platform name "x86_64-nvidia_sn5640_simx-r0" - How to verify it Manual test Signed-off-by: Feng Pan <fenpan@microsoft.com>
dprital
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2026
- Why I did it Fix platform name in eeprom.py to support getting system eeprom on 5640 simx platform - How I did it Use correct platform name "x86_64-nvidia_sn5640_simx-r0" - How to verify it Manual test Signed-off-by: dprital <drorp@nvidia.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
Fix platform name in eeprom.py to support getting system eeprom on 5640 simx platform
Work item tracking
How I did it
Use correct platform name "x86_64-nvidia_sn5640_simx-r0"
How to verify it
Manual test
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)