[Orcas T1][TH5] Setting Broadcom setting for PFCWD counter support per Broadcom CSP case 00012425451#24578
Merged
kperumalbfn merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom Nov 21, 2025
Merged
Conversation
…r Broadcom CSP case 00012425451
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
kperumalbfn
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2025
9 tasks
sdszhang
reviewed
Nov 23, 2025
| global: | ||
| ftem_mem_entries: 65536 | ||
| #enable port queue drop stats | ||
| sai_stats_support_mask: 0x880 |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kewei-arista this change reverted the PR #23772, should we update the stats_support_mask to 0x884 for both Moby and O128 hwsku?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let me confirm this new value works for both Moby and O128 as bit 7 was not set for Moby. I'll update PR once I have the test result.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Addressed the comment in #24729. Note that we don't need to set bit 7 for Moby as SRv6 is not supported for Moby.
8 tasks
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202505: #24632 |
ashutosh-agrawal
pushed a commit
to AnantKishorSharma/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2025
…r Broadcom CSP case 00012425451 (sonic-net#24578) [Orcas T1][TH5] Setting Broadcom setting for PFCWD counter support per Broadcom CSP case 00012425451
hdwhdw
pushed a commit
to hdwhdw/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2025
…r Broadcom CSP case 00012425451 (sonic-net#24578) [Orcas T1][TH5] Setting Broadcom setting for PFCWD counter support per Broadcom CSP case 00012425451
NavdhaJindal
pushed a commit
to NavdhaJindal/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2025
…r Broadcom CSP case 00012425451 (sonic-net#24578) [Orcas T1][TH5] Setting Broadcom setting for PFCWD counter support per Broadcom CSP case 00012425451 Signed-off-by: Navdha Jindal <navdhajindal@microsoft.com>
8 tasks
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202511: #24723 |
9 tasks
FengPan-Frank
pushed a commit
to FengPan-Frank/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2025
…r Broadcom CSP case 00012425451 (sonic-net#24578) [Orcas T1][TH5] Setting Broadcom setting for PFCWD counter support per Broadcom CSP case 00012425451 Signed-off-by: Feng Pan <fenpan@microsoft.com>
9 tasks
yxieca
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…PE-B-O128 and update comments (#24774) Why I did it This PR is addressing a comment in #24578 by correctly set sai_stats_support_mask for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128. Note that bit 7 is not needed for Arista-7060X6-16PE-384C-B-O128S2 as srv6 is not supported for this platform. I just updated the comment for clarity. Signed-off-by: kewei <kewei@arista.com> Co-authored-by: Vineet Mittal <46945843+vmittal-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
mssonicbld
added a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
…PE-B-O128 and update comments
<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md
** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **
If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
"closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"
Please provide the following information:
-->
#### Why I did it
This PR is addressing a comment in sonic-net#24578 by correctly set `sai_stats_support_mask` for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128.
Note that bit 7 is not needed for Arista-7060X6-16PE-384C-B-O128S2 as srv6 is not supported for this platform. I just updated the comment for clarity.
##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
Confirmed pfcwd tests are passing with this change.
<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->
#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [x] 202505
- [x] 202511
#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->
- [x] 202505
#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->
<!--
Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->
#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->
#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
9 tasks
mssonicbld
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
…PE-B-O128 and update comments (#24886) <!-- Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines: https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md failure_prs.log skip_prs.log Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` ** If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx" Please provide the following information: --> #### Why I did it This PR is addressing a comment in #24578 by correctly set `sai_stats_support_mask` for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128. Note that bit 7 is not needed for Arista-7060X6-16PE-384C-B-O128S2 as srv6 is not supported for this platform. I just updated the comment for clarity. ##### Work item tracking - Microsoft ADO **(number only)**: #### How I did it #### How to verify it Confirmed pfcwd tests are passing with this change. <!-- If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012. --> #### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected) <!-- - Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features! - Please also provide a reason for the backporting below. - e.g. - [x] 202006 --> - [ ] 202205 - [ ] 202211 - [ ] 202305 - [ ] 202311 - [ ] 202405 - [ ] 202411 - [x] 202505 - [x] 202511 #### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version) <!-- - Please provide tested image version - e.g. - [x] 20201231.100 --> - [x] 202505 #### Description for the changelog <!-- Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this pull request for inclusion in the changelog: --> <!-- Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU. --> #### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes <!-- Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model is defined Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md --> #### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
hdwhdw
pushed a commit
to hdwhdw/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
…PE-B-O128 and update comments (sonic-net#24774) Why I did it This PR is addressing a comment in sonic-net#24578 by correctly set sai_stats_support_mask for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128. Note that bit 7 is not needed for Arista-7060X6-16PE-384C-B-O128S2 as srv6 is not supported for this platform. I just updated the comment for clarity. Signed-off-by: kewei <kewei@arista.com> Co-authored-by: Vineet Mittal <46945843+vmittal-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Dawei Huang <daweihuang@microsoft.com>
xwjiang-ms
pushed a commit
to xwjiang-ms/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2025
…r Broadcom CSP case 00012425451 (sonic-net#24578) [Orcas T1][TH5] Setting Broadcom setting for PFCWD counter support per Broadcom CSP case 00012425451 Signed-off-by: xiaweijiang <xiaweijiang@microsoft.com>
xwjiang-ms
pushed a commit
to xwjiang-ms/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2025
…PE-B-O128 and update comments (sonic-net#24774) Why I did it This PR is addressing a comment in sonic-net#24578 by correctly set sai_stats_support_mask for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128. Note that bit 7 is not needed for Arista-7060X6-16PE-384C-B-O128S2 as srv6 is not supported for this platform. I just updated the comment for clarity. Signed-off-by: kewei <kewei@arista.com> Co-authored-by: Vineet Mittal <46945843+vmittal-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: xiaweijiang <xiaweijiang@microsoft.com>
jasonbridges
pushed a commit
to jasonbridges/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2026
…PE-B-O128 and update comments (sonic-net#24774) Why I did it This PR is addressing a comment in sonic-net#24578 by correctly set sai_stats_support_mask for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128. Note that bit 7 is not needed for Arista-7060X6-16PE-384C-B-O128S2 as srv6 is not supported for this platform. I just updated the comment for clarity. Signed-off-by: kewei <kewei@arista.com> Co-authored-by: Vineet Mittal <46945843+vmittal-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
FengPan-Frank
pushed a commit
to FengPan-Frank/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2026
…PE-B-O128 and update comments (sonic-net#24774) Why I did it This PR is addressing a comment in sonic-net#24578 by correctly set sai_stats_support_mask for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128. Note that bit 7 is not needed for Arista-7060X6-16PE-384C-B-O128S2 as srv6 is not supported for this platform. I just updated the comment for clarity. Signed-off-by: kewei <kewei@arista.com> Co-authored-by: Vineet Mittal <46945843+vmittal-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Feng Pan <fenpan@microsoft.com>
dprital
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2026
…PE-B-O128 and update comments (#24774) Why I did it This PR is addressing a comment in #24578 by correctly set sai_stats_support_mask for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128. Note that bit 7 is not needed for Arista-7060X6-16PE-384C-B-O128S2 as srv6 is not supported for this platform. I just updated the comment for clarity. Signed-off-by: kewei <kewei@arista.com> Co-authored-by: Vineet Mittal <46945843+vmittal-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: dprital <drorp@nvidia.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
Setting Broadcom setting for PFCWD counter support per Broadcom CSP case 00012425451:
Work item tracking
How I did it
Updated the BCM config file accordingly for all Orcas T1 HWSKUs.
How to verify it
Confirmed the failed test
pfcwd/test_pfcwd_cli.pynow can pass with this new setting and the patch provided by Broadcom, which merged to SAI 13.2.1.23.Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)